Page 622 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

23. 1. 2
Asbo Re Appellant res respondent's 20-02-2016 16-33
20/02/2016
/ Page Numbers: 437,438
--
437,
From: Rewired <re_wired@ymail.com>
Sent time: 20/02/2016 04:32:54 PM
To: Josephine Ward <josie@michaelcarroUandco.com>
Subject: Re: Appellant response to respondent's
The applicant’s case is that I organised illegal raves which caused alarm harm and distress.
To which there is no breach of the licencing 2003 Act or no breach to section 63 present such
as tress pass.
The incidents in question are not of a consecutive manner over a long time period and any
person not in breach of licencing acts or trespass is entitled to have a party without local
authority permission for as long as there is no health and safety risks.
Not that I organised legal moving in or out House party's or birthday parties, with or for
others. that caused alarm harm and distress, as they are not a breach of law in doing so
without a warning of the local council. With regards to statement I know you have helped me
and I have taken a your advice in so many different aspects of the case already, but strongly
believe it is in my best interest to confront the police statements point out the consistence’s as
they seem to be misled to the truth.
as for the Time stamps do I stand a fair trial or would any other person do so if presented with
such errors in the evidence, when polices rely on as the case against myself with no civil
witness mentioning myself to be present or acting in a manner likely to cause alarm harm
distress.
I would also like to point out that as my acting solicitor and that of you having a copy of my
criminal record, you would know if I had been the dates in question for acting anti-social, no
matter if civil or criminal.
And I do listen to you and respect you and what you say to me, I just some time question it.
On Saturday, 20 February 2016, 16:02, Josephine Ward <josie@michaelcarrollandco.com>
wrote:
Simon
With regards to your statement I have tried to help you with this. I have explained what is not
helpful etc.
You simply disagree with the advice that I am giving, and this has always been the case. You
are misinterpreting the Respondent's case which is simply that the raves / parties whether
legal or not cause anti-social behaviour - i.e. sleepless nights, noise, nuisance etc. You
dispute that you are the organiser and that is the only facts that I requested information about.
The court is not looking at one isolated date but all dates and the conduct on each of the
dates. I have also explained to you the events that cause you problems and the reasons why.
Organisation is not simply providing equipment, manning the gate but also sourcing premises
and I have explained that this can be inferred. Even if a section 144 LAPSO is up there can
still be antisocial behaviour albeit the event is not a rave under the legislation.
I have made it very clear the irrelevant points and aspects that do not assist you. You do not
accept the advice.
Josephine
On 20 February 2016 at 15:41 Rewired <re_wired@ymail.com> wrote:
no Josie I am not happy, I did not write this with you or was not involved in the making of it,
you want to deal with the applicants skeleton bundle but I have yet been able to put my