Page 632 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

To: Mother
Attachments:
SIMON CORDELL APPELLANT RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT SKELETON
ARGUMENT 20.02.2016.docx 18.90 KB

3
My 1st Asbo Response Bundle/ pub Book Issue: 1!
RESPONSE TO HHJ PAWLAK LETTER / Page Numbers:
417,418,419,420,421,422,423,424
“(1) WHAT INVOLVEMENT IN EACH EVENT
(RAVE) RELIED ON BY THE RESPONDENT,
THE APPELLANT ADMITS TO HAVING HAD
ANY INVOVMENT!
(A) 25.05.2014 – 5 ST GEORGES INDUSTRIAL
ESTATE, WHITE HART LANE
The Appellant relies on his previous statement served.
The Appellant will state that he was delivering food to
some homeless people. The Appellant will state that
there was no rave, no sound equipment, lights,
generators etc in his van. The Appellant will state that
there was no rave in progress and no intention for any
event to take place. The Appellant will state that there
was a section 144 LAPSO notice clearly displayed by
the occupants who were treating the premises as their
home + MORE!”
417,
RESPONSE TO HHJ PAWLAK'S LETTER
DATED 22ND FEBRUARY 2016
(1) WHAT INVOLVEMENT IN EACH EVENT
(RAVE) RELIED ON BY THE RESPONDENT, THE
APPELLANT ADMITS TO HAVING HAD ANY
INVOVMENT!
(A) 25.05.2014 - 5 ST GEORGES INDUSTRIAL
ESTATE, WHITE HART LANE
The Appellant relies on his previous statement served.
The Appellant will state that he was delivering food to
some homeless people.
The Appellant will state that there was no rave, no
sound equipment, lights, generators etc in his van.
The Appellant will state that there was no rave in
progress and no intention for any event to take place.
The Appellant will state that there was a section 144
LAPSO notice clearly displayed by the occupants who
were treating the premises as their home.
The Appellant will state that he had empty speaker
cases in his van which would not have been able to
play any sound as they never had any drivers in the
speaker boxes. The van was used to store the speakers.
The Appellant will state that he specifically requested
that the officers who attended note down the fact that