Page 739 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

stated that he had been attacked from behind but on investigation it transpired that this male
had been one of the people seen on the roof earlier and had fallen whilst getting down."
"If checked there is a time laps in the statements made by police PS 92YE it states that he
attended at 03:10hrs and noted the boy had come down from a roof in Wood Grange Avenue
the rear of Progress Way and then Police spoke to staff at progress way.
But CAD number 2290 8th June at 05:04 states the same boy is in wood Grange Avenue
again and made a 999 call making a claim of assault 01:54 mins after and is believed to be
the man fallen of the roof at 03:10 who was seen getting down safely and police state that
they can see the roof top clearly from there police service centre.
It is also noted A/PS CHARLES MILES 724YE "statement at approximately 06:30Hrs we
received a call to nearby Wood grange Gardens, to reports of a male assaulted. Following an
initial investigation this individual matched the description of a male earlier observed on the
warehouse roof. It appeared that he had fallen off of the roof and into some bushes and his
injuries were consistent with a fall from height. He was heavily under the influence of alcohol
and quite probably illegal drugs. He went to North Middlesex Hospital with the London
Ambulance Service."
These times do not match up as in A/Insp Hamill 201566 statement he says he sent someone
to the attack at 05:04 CAD 2290 and in A/PS CHARLES MILES 724YE statement he said
the call did not happen until 06:30Hrs.
Was it 5 or 6 hundred hours or at 1 hundred hours and if it was at 100 hours why did police
leave him to go and speak to people at the gate of progress way, if his injuries were so server
he had to go to the hospital at 5 0r 6 hundred hours?
Mr Simon Cordell would state; that he believes the police already have on their systems,
the person’s name they were in contact with leading up to this. The public Order Unit at
Scotland Yard would hold the information and also the police in Essex would have
information.
Mr Simon Cordell will state; It has taken him months to gather information to the dates in
this ASBO application, and he feels that the police already hold the information that he is
being accused off.
Statement off: Eric Baker Police Officer 219382 Dated 19/08/2014
He is a police officer in London Borough of Enfield and has been tasked to contact residents
of the Borough who had called police to inform them of an illegal rave that took place over
Friday 7th June 2014 and Saturday 8th June 2014, in a warehouse in Progress Way Enfield
On Tuesday 19th August 2014 I contacted the caller of the CAD 10471/07June 2014 by
telephone that was happy to give an impact statement regarding how illegal rave affected her
and her husband over the above dates mentioned.
The caller wishes to remain anonymous. I will refer to her as complainant "A" The original
notes taken from the below statement are present in my pocketbook serial 370/14, page 1.
Complainant "a" said it was a warm evening and we had to keep the windows shut because of
the noise. The next day we could not even go out into the garden because of the noise. It kept
me and my husband up all night and made us very anxious the next day. The illegal rave
totally ruined our weakened" This concluded what complainant 'A" said regarding this
matter.
Mr Simon Cordell will state; “that at no point did he take part in any form of Anti
Social behaviour and he did not organize or hire any equipment to this private house party
th
th
th
neither was he attending a rave on the 6 7 8 June 2014th.
739
508,
STATEMENT OF WITNESS new new.doc
Doglas Skinner: