Page 641 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table 1st Half
P. 641

16
               The 1st Injunction Order / Lemmy / pub Book Issue: 1!
               Council surveyor Steve Stirk Notes
               / Page Numbers:  65
               Council surveyor
               Steve Stirk Notes!
               65
               10 May 2017

                 Simon Cordell’s
                 The 1st Injunction Order Dated: 00/00/2014
                 INDEX

                 Lemmy Nwabuisi
                 From: Steve Stick.
                 Sent: 10 May 2017 / 08:42
                 To: Lemmy Nvrabuisi
                 Subject: 109, BURNCROFT AVENUE ENFIELD, EN3
                 7JQ
                 Further to my conversation today please note the following,
                 I carried out a joint with Sarah back in January regarding
                 low water pressure to 117 While on location the following
                 was noted
                 Kitchen internal wall has been partly removed
                 3 large industrial type printers found with assorted inks and
                 cleaning liquids Internal gate installed to front door
                 While all these items could be used in normal day to day
                 interests the tenant made claims he was actively involved in
                 planning and conduction events and the equipment was used
                 to produce marketing leaflets and posters.
                 This Monday we has reason to attend 113 to carry out a full
                 lock change given accusation from the tenant that his lock
                 had been glued so was unable to gain access the tenant claim
                 the damaged was caused by 109, (this cannot be confirmed)
                 as the tenant did not attend both Sarah and myself did go in
                 and while there was confronted by the tenant from 109, the
                 tenant for about twenty minutes would not leave us alone
                 and became increasingly aggressive despite attempt to
                 explain to him that we had not come to see him or indeed
                 were able to comment of any of his accusations on how
                 Enfield had ruin his lie were putting him in danger by
                 leaving him in his flat, during this confrontation the tenant
                 from 117 passed through the passage and the tenant from
                 109 stated he was going to ruin his life and generally became
                 more irate towards the tenant.
                 It is clear that we are unable to allow this to continue as the
                 body posture from 117 was defensive and did not wish to
                 reply or get into any form of conversation with this tenant
   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646