Page 622 - 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table All

Defendant's Name and MR SIMON CORDELL
Ref.
Fee Account no. 0079006
Seal
Notes on completion
Tick which boxes apply and specify the legislation where
appropriate
1) Enter the full name of the person making the application
2) Enter the full name of the person the Injunction is to be
directed to
3) By application in pending proceedings Under Statutory
provision Part 1 ANTI-SOCIL BEHAVIOUR 2014
This application is made under Part 8 of the Civil
Procedure Rules
This application raises issues under the Human Rights
Act 1998.
Yes/No
The Claimant (1) THE LONDON BOROUGH OF
ENFIELD applies to the. Court for an injunction order in
the following terms:
The Defendant (2) ^ SIMON CORDELL must (3>
1. Permit the Claimant’s employees and contractors
access into 109 Burncroft Avenue, Enfield, EN3 7JQ to carry
out routine maintenance inspections and necessary repairs
within 48 hours of written notification.
2. Keep his dog on a lead in communal areas outside his
property.
The Defendant MR SIMON CORDELL
be forbidden (whether by himself or by instructing or
encouraging or permit any other person)
3. From engaging or threatening to engage in conduct
that is likely to cause pi violence and verbal abuse to the
Claimant’s employees, tenants and visitors to block of flats at
Burncroft Avenue, Enfield.
4. From engaging or threatening to engage in conduct
that is likely to cause intimidation, harassment, alarm and
distress to the Claimant’s employees, tell and visitors to the
block of flats at Burncroft Avenue, Enfield.
5. From engaging or threatening to engage in conduct
that is likely to cause nuisance and annoyance to the
Claimant’s employees, tenants and visitors to t block of flats
at Burncroft Avenue, Enfield.
6. From using his pet dog to frighten, intimidate or
threaten violence to the Claimant’s employees, tenants and
visitors of the block of flats at Burncroft Avenue, Enfield.
7. Set out any proposed orders requiring acts to be done.
Delete if no mandatory order is sought.
8. Set out here the proposed terms of the injunction
order (if the defendant is a limited company delete the