Page 1068 - 9. 1st half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 1068

after his wife asked his cousin to call the police.
                 Mr Mathiyalagan stated that he telephoned the
                 police on 101 to report the incident and was asked
                 to go and make a statement at Edmonton police
                 station. He stated that he did so in the morning of
                 Tuesday 06 March 2018.
                 17.    On 26/02/2018, Mr Mathiyalagan stated
                 that he returned from work at 11:30pm and went
                 to the kitchen to get something to eat; his wife and
                 daughter were already asleep. At about 11:45pm,
                 while he was in the kitchen, he heard loud banging
                 noises on his front door and rattling noises on his
                 letterbox. He thought that his cousin had returned
                 from work and was knocking on the door to be let
                 In, he went to the door and spoke in his language
                 but there was no response. He then opened the
                 door and saw the Defendant standing outside his
                 front door. As soon as the Defendant saw him, he
                 ran away. The matter was referred to the police,
                 but no actions took place.
                 18.    It is submitted that the Defendant should
                 have been arrested, kept on remand and brought
                 back to the County Court pursuant to CPR 65.47
                 which states as follows:
                 •      This rule applies where a person is arrested
                 pursuant to –
                 •      a power of arrest attached to a provision of
                 an injunction; or
                 •      a warrant of arrest.
                 •      The judge before whom a person is
                 brought following his arrest may –
                 •      deal with the matter; or
                 •      adjourn the proceedings.
                 19.    The Police are aware of the injunction
                 order as they have been served with a copy of the
                 same. However, they have failed to enforce the
                 terms of the interim injunction.

                 20.    The Claimant is therefore bringing an
                 application for the Defendant’s committal.

               93,
               09th January 2018

                         CLAIM NUMBER: D02EDO73

                   IN THE EDMONTON COUNTY COURT

                                  BETWEEN:

                                 {CLAIMANT}
   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073