Page 1096 - 9. 1st half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table

01m. Edmonton County (2) 02_05_2018.docx
01m. Edmonton County (2) 02_05_2018.htm
01m. Edmonton County (2) 02_05_2018.mp3
2.
Edmonton County Court (2).WMA
[00:00:03] Dog Barking in the Background Noise.
[00:00:04] COURT AUTOMATED AUDIO.
[00:00:04] Stop barking.
[00:01:14] How are you doing. who am I Speaking to?
[00:01:17] I'm not here. Okay. Slow and steady. anyway, you made me laugh.
[00:01:23] how can the court help.
[00:01:24] You are good. You are good. Basically, I have had an application go through that
was fraudulently put under the Companies Act by a gentleman called Lemmy who works for
Enfield Council.
[00:01:33] it is Mr. Cordell on the phone. Simon Cordell basically hmm, the application
wasn't ever served to me in accordance to the law and the prohibitions for service of Notice.
So what I initially done was I went up on the 1st of January this I was in a police cell and
when I was in a police cell being detained I had to have an appropriate adult my appropriate
though I attended the police station and we had an interview with My solicitor at present after
my Solicitor left and my appropriate left the police custody officer allowed the third party
company to come into the police cells and try to serve me. He never mentioned. He never
gave me no forms while I was in the cell. I couldn't open the door and the affidavit of
services said my home address. So, I believe I was never served. When I was in the cell I'm
waiting for the records. Now what happened is I went to court and I explained this on. On the
5th of January four days after the 1st yeah, and the judge was there he was very kind and an
AN AN AN AN AN A good judge and what he said is that he refuses to put the um the
injunction order from me till he sees the affidavit of service.
[00:02:45] He refuses now I said to him in that courtroom. Is the tape being this courtroom
being recorded. And he swore yes. Kept courtrooms being recorded and you can request a
copy of the court case and you can hear it. I'm telling everybody that this is not on you. The
injunction is not on you. So, on the 5th he told me it's not on me but what he would like to do
is on the thirty yeah, which was.
[00:03:08] hmm, hmm.
[00:03:08] Yesterday. He would like to have another hearing. He would like to see the other
day service and in that time of seeing the affidavit of service he will, hmm he will tell me on
the thirtyeah,th whether it is activated yet or not.
Yesterday I didn't go because I was feeling too ill to go to court but was able to call my
mother to attended for me. And what's happened is a number of judges come into place and
she has now said that she's seen this affidavit of service. She agrees that I wasn't served in the
police cell but while I was in the police cell a bloke went to my front door and he's put
something through my front door an affidavit of service a notice of service. Now she's saying
because I attended court on the 5th she believes I and I touched this service.
Now she's not only just started the injunction from starting from yesterday. She's saying
it starts from the day when the judge said it wasn't on me which was which was the 5th. So,
she's saying she's back in everything that's happened in between which is all fabricated stuff
that made up loads of stories ger stories which I have got the video evidence for. Now what
I'm upset about is I couldn't have been served on this day yeah because I have a camera in my
corridor one in my front room one in my kitchen on 24 hour recordings so you can see while
I was in the police station not getting served in accordance to the law. You can see someone
post something through my letterbox because my letterbox is recorded. Then you can see that