Page 202 - 9. 1st half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table

-AND-

(DEFENDANT)

MR SIMON CORDELL

DIRECTIONS ORDER

Defendant was due to allegations of verbal abuse,
threats, harassment and intimidation made against
him by some of his neighbours.
72. I make this Witness Statement in support
of the Claimant’s application dated 08th January
2018. This is my second witness statement in the
above proceedings.
Backgrounds to the case
73. The Claimant obtained an interim
injunction against the Defendant on 09th August
2017 under claim number D02ED073. On 13th
December 2017, the Court made an order striking
out the Claimant’s claim on the basis that it failed
to file its direction questionnaire on 17th
November 2017 as directed. The Court stated that
it received the Claimant's questionnaire on 20th
November 2017 and therefore ordered that the
Claim be struck out and that the interim injunction
order be discharged.
74. The Claimant's solicitor emailed the
Edmonton County Court on 14th November 2017
asking that the Claim be reinstated as it had filed
its direction questionnaire on 17th November at
11.59 and was therefore within time. The email
has not been responded to until today.
75. On 03rd January 2018, the Claimant filed
an application notice at the Court by email asking
for the Claim to be reinstated. The application was
filed after the Court served an order dated 02nd
January 2018 ordering the Claimant to pay the
Defendant’s legal costs. A copy of the application
notice can be found under exhibit LN01.
76. Mr Mathiyalagan who is one of the
Defendant’s neighbours and resident at Flat 117
Burncroft Avenue, Enfield contacted me and
complained about further incidents of anti-social
Behaviour he was subjected to by the

11,
14th November 2017
11th November 2017