Page 359 - 9. 1st half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 359

The Judge read the written evidence filed and the
                 Order of District Judge Taylor dated 09 January
                 2018 in which it was ordered that the Defendant
                 should be forbidden (whether by himself or by
                 instructing or permitting any other person):
                 1.     From engaging or threatening to engage in
                 conduct that is likely to cause physical violence
                 and verbal abuse to the claimant’s employees,
                 tenants to the block of flats at Bumcroft Avenue,
                 Enfield.
                 2.     From engaging or threatening to engage in
                 conduct that is likely to cause intimidation,
                 harassment, alarm and distress to the Claimant’s
                 employees, tenants and visitors to the block of
                 flats at Bumcroft Avenue, Enfield.

                 3.     From engaging or threatening to engage in
                 conduct that is likely to cause nuisance and
                 annoyance to the claimant's employees, tenants
                 and visitors of flats at Bumcroft Avenue, Enfield.
                 AND UPON the Court noting that a power of
                 arrest being attached on the above

               143
               09 January 2018
               09 January 2018
               15 March 2018
               01 March 2018 and 26 February 2018
               dated 10 May

                         CLAIM NUMBER: D02EDO73

                   IN THE EDMONTON COUNTY COURT

                                  BETWEEN:

                                 {CLAIMANT}

                  THE MAYOR AND BURGESSES OF THE
                     LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD

                                      -AND-

                                 (DEFENDANT)

                            MR SIMON CORDELL

                             DIRECTIONS ORDER

                 AND THE COURT being satisfied that the
                 Defendant has been guilty of contempt of court in
   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364