Page 700 - 9. 1st half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 700

On 01/03/2018

                         CLAIM NUMBER: D02EDO73

                   IN THE EDMONTON COUNTY COURT

                                  BETWEEN:

                                 {CLAIMANT}

                  THE MAYOR AND BURGESSES OF THE
                     LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD

                                      -AND-

                                 (DEFENDANT)

                            MR SIMON CORDELL

                             DIRECTIONS ORDER

                 Evidence in support of the application notice
                 dated20.04.2018 (part 10)
                 21.    On 09/01/2018 the Court made an interim
                 injunction order against Mr Cordell (the
                 Defendant), attaching a power of arrest. The main
                 terms of the order are summarised as follows:
                 The Defendant, Mr Cordell, be forbidden (whether
                 by himself or by instructing or encouraging or
                 permitting any other person:
                 Clause 3: from engaging or threatening to engage
                 in conduct that is likely to cause physical violence
                 and verbal abuse to the claimant’s employees,
                 tenants to the block of flats at Burncroft Avenue,
                 Enfield.
                 Clause 4: From engaging or threatening to engage
                 in conduct that is likely to cause intimidation,
                 harassment, alarm and distress to the Claimant’s
                 employees, tenants and visitors to the block of
                 flats at Burncroft Avenue, Enfield.
                 Clause 5. From engaging or threatening to engage
                 in conduct that is likely to cause nuisance and
                 annoyance to the claimant’s employees, tenants
                 and visitors of flats at Burncroft Avenue, Enfield.
                 Clause 7: A power of arrest is attached to the
                 above paragraphs.
                 22.    The Defendants have committed several
                 breaches by committing several acts of anti-social
                 Behaviour  against his neighbours. Mr and Mrs
                 Mathiyalagan have been the victim of several
   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705