Page 927 - 9. 1st half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table

-AND-

(DEFENDANT)

MR SIMON CORDELL

DIRECTIONS ORDER

Evidence in support of the application notice
dated20/04/2018 (part 10)
1. On 09/01/2018 the Court made an interim
injunction order against Mr Cordell (the
Defendant), attaching a power of arrest. The main
terms of the order are summarised as follows:
The Defendant, Mr Cordell, be forbidden (whether
by himself or by instructing or encouraging or
permitting any other person:
Clause 3: from engaging or threatening to engage
in conduct that is likely to cause physical violence
and verbal abuse to the claimant's employees,
tenants to the block of flats at Burn croft Avenue,
Enfield.
Clause 4: From engaging or threatening to engage
in conduct that is likely to cause intimidation,
harassment, alarm and distress to the Claimant’s
employees, tenants and visitors to the block of
flats at Bumcroft Avenue, Enfield.
Clause 5: From engaging or threatening to engage
in conduct that is likely to cause nuisance and
annoyance to the claimant’s employees, tenants
and visitors of flats at Burncroft Avenue, Enfield.
Clause 7: A power of arrest is attached to the
above paragraphs.

2. The Defendants have committed several
breaches by committing several acts of anti-social
Behaviour against his neighbours. Mr and Mrs
Mathiyalagan have been the victim of several
incidents of harassment, intimidation and a serious
assault on 15/03/2018. Despite the matter being
reported to the police, they have failed to take
actions against the Defendant to enforce the terms
of the injunction.
3. The incidents are supported by the
affidavit of Mr and Mrs Mathiyalagan dated
20/04/2018.
4. The most recent incident took place on
15/03/2018; the Defendant assaulted Mr
Mathiyalagan who then tried to defend himself.
Mr Mathiyalagan sustained personal injuries to his
face and had to some of his teeth removed as a