Page 961 - 9. 1st half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table

claimant's employees, tenants to the block
of fiats at Burncroft Avenue, Enfield.
j. Clause 4: From engaging or threatening to
engage in conduct that is likely to cause
intimidation, harassment, alarm and
distress to the Claimant’s employees,
tenants and visitors to the block of fiats at
Burncroft Avenue, Enfield.
k. Clause 5: From engaging or threatening to
engage in conduct that is likely to cause
nuisance and annoyance to the claimant's
employees, tenants and visitors of flats at
Burncroft Avenue, Enfield.
l. Clause 1: A power of arrest is attached to
the above paragraphs.
5. The following incidents/ breaches of the interim
injunction order took place on the following days:
Dated: 20 April 2018
20/04/2018

3
The 2nd Injunction Order / Lemmy / pub Book Issue: 1!
Miss Revathy Mathiyalagan/ Page Numbers: p09 to 11 + New Pages: 106,107,108,
Updated 25/04/2018 by Hand Post into My Letter Box!
106,
Dated 20 April 2018
20/04/2018
A lie made up in MRS REVATHY MATHIYALAGAN AFFIDAVIT stating that they have
gotten housed to 109 Burncroft Avenue En3 7jq with her family by the London Borough of
Waltham Forest and have occupied the Property since
11 September 2016
This is not true as can be checked with Mathiyalagans Statements and the fact that they lived
in the building since
2013?
I am the tenant of Flat 117 Burncroft Avenue, Enfield, EN3 7JQ. My flat is located two floors
above Mr Cordell (thereafter ’the Defendant’). I live there with my husband Markandu and
my child who is 3 years old. I have been housed to this Property with my family by the
London Borough of Waltham Forest and have occupied the Property since
11 September 2016

CLAIM NUMBER: D02EDO73

IN THE EDMONTON COUNTY COURT

BETWEEN:

{CLAIMANT}