Page 968 - 9. 1st half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table

the content of this witness statement is within my own personal knowledge it is true and
insofar as it is not within my persona! knowledge it is true to the best of my knowledge.
I WILL SAY AS FOLLOWS
A lie made up in MRS REVATHY MATHIYALAGAN AFFIDAVIT stating that they have
gotten housed to 109 Burncroft Avenue En3 7jq with her family by the London Borough of
Waltham Forest and have occupied the Property since
11 September 2016
This is not true as can be checked with Mathiyalagans Statements and the fact that they lived
in the building since
2013?
1. I am the tenant of Flat 117 Burncroft Avenue, Enfield, EN3 7JQ. My flat is located two
floors above Mr Cordell (thereafter ’the Defendant’). I live there with my husband Markandu
and my child who is 3 years old. I have been housed to this Property with my family by the
London Borough of Waltham Forest and have occupied the Property since
11 September 2016
The Property was given to me as a temporary accommodation.
2. I make this affidavit in support of the Claimant’s (my husband) application for the
Defendant’s committal on the basis of a breach of the interim injunction order made by the
Edmonton County Court on
09 January 2018
05/03/2018
event witness wife of Mathiyalagan “REVATHY”
20/04/2018
affidavit
My police interview is on cd
3. I witnessed the terrible assault committed by the Defendant on my husband on 05 March
2018 and confirm the facts stated in my husband s affidavit dated
20 April 2018
4. Mr Cordell harassed, abused and repeatedly punched my husband on his face, causing him
to bleed and to break two of his teeth, I tried to stop him but he would not listen to me.
5. We contacted the police who arrested both Mr Cordell and my husband. My husband was
kept by the police overnight while he was a victim of the assault. The police could see the
facial injuries, bleedings and damages sustained to his face and teeth but decided to keep him
at the police station while he was a victim of the assault. Surprisingly I heard that Mr Cordell
was arrested, interviewed and released on the same day. The police decided not to charge him
for some unknown reasons.
6. I believe that the Police decision was wrong, as there is Clear evidence of assault, I was not
interviewed while being a key witness to the incident. The Defendant should have been
arrested and brought back to the Court following the breach of the injunction order so it could
decide on his arrest.
7. I fear for my family safety and feels that the interim injunction with the London Borough
of Enfield obtained on
09 January 2018
is not providing me and my family protection as the police refuses to enforce the terms of the
order despite clear evidence that Mr Cordell has breached the terms.
The situation has left me and my family terrified. There’s a letter from my GP which
confirm that, as seen under exhibit RM1.
AFFIDAVITS
Dated:
20/04/2018