Page 1383 - 10. 2nd half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table

1383
2252,
courts. At this time the 22 November 2018 we still have not had a copy of the courts
sealed order.
• I believe there is errors within Enfield Council’s draft order to what was actually said in
court, and I do not know how to address this, but Enfield Council is stating things to
people that was not even stated in court.
• At this time I am trying to put in an application to obtain the transcripts of the court
hearing, but I am waiting for some information from the court in order to be able to do
this.
• Mr Cordell has not long been released from hospital where he was under section,
Enfield Council have still not moved him and he still living in hell regarding what the
neighbours are doing to him.
• It would seem Enfield Council has been relaying incorrect information to the mental
health team regarding the court hearings, and I believe they are being able to get away
th
with this due to how they drafted the court order of the 09 August 2018 hearing.
• It seems Enfield Council is doing everything they can not to move my son, they have
even stated they are going for a possession order of his flat, in fact they told the mental
health team:
“Enfield Council has decided to seek possession of Mr Cordell’s flat via the courts. In a recent court
case the judge recommended that Enfield Council rehouse Mr Cordell on the proviso that he
engages with the mental health team which is failed to do.”
• This was not said in court in fact when Enfield Council tried to put this in place you told
them no you would not allow this.
• It seems as if Enfield Council will stop at nothing to not move my son, I have been trying
to liaison with Enfield Council and the mental health team regarding moving my son, it
would seem shortly after the court hearing my son was moved over to a
1383
2253,
new mental health team who I was in contact with asking for help in regards to them
writing a letter regarding my son’s housing which they refused to do until they had met
him, this in itself was going to cause a problem because as you are aware my son does
not feel as if he has a mental health problem, I even emailed Angela Hague as she was
the last person to have assessed my son in June 2018 which the court had a report of
and was read before the court on the 26 June 2018 at the hearing.
• The issue seems to be with the like to like property, which I do not believe is appropriate
as I believe my son needs family support and someone staying with him in order for us
to try and make him understand that he needs support from the mental health team, I
know this was spoken about in court on 9 August 2018 where I believe Enfield Council is
stating you told them to consider this, but Enfield Council will not consider this unless I
get a letter from the mental health team, Enfield Council is also under the assumption I
stated my son needed supported accommodation, I did not state this in court, I said I did
not want my son in supported accommodation that if my son had a two-bedroom
property his family would support him which I believe in the correct things to do for my
son.