Page 1591 - 10. 2nd half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table

to the panel on the 17/08/2018 and it was ready to go to the panel on this date, but this
was deferred to be considered at the next panel meeting which would have taken place on
28/09/2018, which never happened. The reason for it being deferred was so that I Miss
Lorraine Cordell could try and get a letter from the mental health team, which I could not so
it therefore should have gone ahead to the panel on the 28/09/2018, which I do have the
emails to prove this. I also do not understand why Enfield Council is stating supported
accommodation was being asked for as this was never asked for. I did however state in
court that a 2 bedroom would be better as my son could have family live with him so he
could get support from his family; I have never said I am his carer I have never said a lot of
things that Enfield Council is stating I have said. It was stated in the court order. UPON the
Defendant's mother Mrs Lorraine Cordell, confirming that she will engage with the Claimant
and assist the Defendant's neighbourhood officer in making a housing management transfer
application on or before 16 August 2018. UPON the Claimant agreeing that it will deal with
the housing management transfer application as quickly as possible after being made. AND
UPON the Defendants mother agreeing to engage with the Enfield Mental Health Unit team
so the Defendant could receive assistance with his mental health conditions and housing.
The order was to be agreed with my son’s solicitor upon being drafted by Enfield Council,
but my son’s solicitor was on annual leave and therefore did not reply to Enfield Council
order until she came back of leave, but when you emailed her it came back that she was on
annual leave so Enfield Council was well aware of this. Upon her return from annual leave
her amended order was sent over to Ludmilla Lyavoo, which my son’s solicitor never had a
reply back from Ludmilla Lyavoo regarding her amended order, but some days after the
amended order was sent over to Ludmilla Lyavoo, it seems an order was sealed at
Edmonton Country Court which was not agreed on which was Enfield Council drafted order,
which we never agreed to and feel it is misleading as to what was said in court. I believe a
lot of what was said in court is not being told and misleading information is being said,
maybe someone should ask Ludmilla Lyavoo what the judge said when Ludmilla Lyavoo said
she would go for a possession order to the judge because she did not get what she wanted.
4447,
There is also the fact that my son was willing to stay in Hospital when he was sectioned on
the 25/10/2018, it was the hospital that discharged him on the 15/11/2018 due to not
getting the section 3 on my son they wanted, that was heard on the 14/11/2018, my son
said as soon as he knew they was not allowing the section 3 on the 14/11/2018 that they
would kick him out of the hospital, as this is what they did in 2016, and the next day the
15/11/2018 that is what the doctors did kicked him out the hospital, yet my son was willing
to stay and build trust up with the doctors and the mental health team, which had broken
down due to what has been ongoing for some time. Which in fact would have been a lot
better as if he had been allowed to stay in hospital like he wanted maybe by now they
would have been trust built up with the doctors and teams, this is what Soohah Appadoo
wanted to do as he saw that there was a real problem with trust and stated this at the
appeal on the section 2 at the hearing. On the 16/11/2018 I myself spoke to Soohah
Appadoo on the phone, but since that we have heard nothing from him is this what is being
called support put in place when
my son was discharged from hospital?