Page 1597 - 10. 2nd half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table

• UPON the Defendant's mother Mrs Lorraine Cordell, confirming that she will engage with
the Claimant and assist the Defendant's neighbourhood officer in making a housing
management transfer application on or before 16 August 2018.
• UPON the Claimant agreeing that it will deal with the housing management transfer
application as quickly as possible after being made.
• AND UPON the Defendants mother agreeing to engage with the Enfield Mental Health
Unit team so the Defendant could receive assistance with his mental health conditions
and housing.
The order was to be agreed with my son’s solicitor upon being drafted by Enfield Council,
but my son’s solicitor was on annual leave and therefore did not reply to Enfield Council
order until she came back of leave, But when you emailed her it came back that she was on
annual leave so Enfield Council was well aware of this.
Upon her return from annual leave her amended order was sent over to Ludmilla Iyavoo,
which my son’s solicitor never had a reply back from Ludmilla Iyavoo regarding her
amended order, but some days after the amended order was sent over to Ludmilla Iyavoo, it
seems an order was sealed at Edmonton Country Court which was not agreed on which was
Enfield Council drafted order, which we never agreed to and feel it is misleading as to what
was said in court.
I believe a lot of what was said in court is not being told and misleading information is being
said, maybe someone should ask Ludmilla Iyavoo what the judge said when Ludmilla Iyavoo
said she would go for a possession order to the judge because she did not get what she
wanted.
There is also the fact that my son was willing to stay in Hospital when he was sectioned on
the 25/10/2018, it was the hospital that discharged him on the 15/11/2018 due to not
getting the section 3 on my son they wanted, that was heard on the 14/11/2018, my son
said as soon as he knew they was not allowing the section 3 on the 14/11/2018 that they
would kick him out of the hospital, as
2314,
this is what they did in 2016, and the next day the 15/11/2018 that is what the doctors did
kicked him out the hospital, yet my son was willing to stay and build trust up with the
doctors and the mental health team, which had broken down due to what has been ongoing
for some time.
Which in fact would have been a lot better as if he had been allowed to stay in hospital like
he wanted maybe by now they would have been trust built up with the doctors and teams,
this is what Soohah Appadoo wanted to do as he saw that there was a real problem with
trust and stated this at the appeal on the section 2 at the hearing. On the 16/11/2018 I
myself spoke to Soohah Appadoo on the phone, but since that we have heard nothing from
him is this what is being called support put in place when my son was discharged from
hospital?
This misleading information needs to stop as it is a beach of the data protection act.
I look forward to hearing from you regarding this, please can you reply as I did not get a
reply from you to my last email, I sent to you.
Regards
Lorraine Cordell
Classification: OFFICIAL
Classification: OFFICIAL
Be the first to receive the latest Council news straight to your inbox