Page 656 - 10. 2nd half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 656

patient. Due to the complexity, we have not written to him to inform him, as it was felt
                   this would-be better-done face to face. His mother who will be attending the appointment
                   is aware and was the one to raise the complaint. When you see him, please could you tell
                   him that ‘some clinical information was shared by the Trust with the London Borough of
                   Enfield, in response to a court order. We are duty bound to share information when
                   requested in a court order. However, the information we provided was not proportionate
                   to the request. We are investigating this. Can you let me know that you have received this
                   email?

               57.
               •  Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:
                   57. 1. 2.
                   GoDaddy -1-4737 - 23-08-2018 19-21
                   23/08/2018
                   / Page Numbers: 2092

               --

               1
               The Doctor’s Folder / pub Book Issue: 5!
               Stage 5
               Folder 5
               Originator Details: 23 Aug 2018
               Last Amended by Details: 23 Aug 2018
               Ruslan Zinchenko Medical
               Page Numbers:2 + 3
               2
               Originator Details: 23 Aug 2018 12:38
               Ruslan Zinchenko Medical
               Originally Entered by Details: 23 Aug 2018 12:40
               Ruslan Zinchenko Last Amended by Details: 23 Aug 2018 12:40
               Ruslan Zinchenko Validated by Details: 23 Aug 2018 12:40
               Ruslan Zinchenko Significant: No Added to Risk
               History: No
               Contains Third Party Info: No Conceal
               From Client: Not Concealed
               3
               CT1 Zinchenko
               Email received from Rachel Yona:
               Dear Dr Zinchenko,
               "For your awareness, I am investigating an information governance breach related to this
               patient. Due to the complexity, we have not written to him to inform him, as it was felt this
               would-be better-done face to face. His mother who will be attending the appointment is
               aware and was the one to raise the complaint. When you see him, please could you tell him
               that ‘some clinical information was shared by the Trust with the London Borough of Enfield,
               in response to a court order. We are duty bound to share information when requested in a
   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661