Page 819 - 10. 2nd half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 819

Extranet may be subject to recording/and or monitoring in accordance with relevant
               legislation.
               This email has been scanned for viruses, but we cannot guarantee that it will be free of
               viruses or malware. The recipient should perform their own virus checks.


               70.
               Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:
               1022. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._ LBE v Simon Cordell-E00ED049 Order 09082018
               17/09/2018
               / Page Numbers: 2142,2143,2144,2145,2146,2147,2148
               --
               2142,
               From:  Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk>
               Sent: 17 September 2018 11:28
               To: 'enquiries@edmonton.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk'
               Subject: FW: LBE v Simon Cordell-E00ED049 Order 09082018
               Attachments:  LBE v Simon Cordell-E00ED049 Amended Order.docx
               Importance:  High
               Dear DJ Dias,
               I was wondering if you can help at this time the hearing of the 09/08/2018 there is still an
               outstanding order to be sealed by the court. I know my son's solicitor has been trying to
               address this with Enfield Council and as yet has had no reply from them regarding the
               amended order. I know my son's solicitor has sent the amended order over to the court
               directly.
               I have also been working with them regarding the housing move for my son, but am being
               told they will only move him to a like to like property; this will be going to the housing panel
               on the 28/09/2018 regarding the move for my son, I know in Enfield Council order that was
               made up they included in this regarding the order from the court my son is moved I believe
               this was to give my son more weight with the housing panel.
               My son is not at all well and the and I believe he does need a two bedroom property so he
               can get the support he needs from his family as I said in court on the 09/08/2018, I am not
               just saying this to be able to get my son a two bedroom, I am saying this so my son can have
               family with him all the time so that I can try and get my son back to some sort of a normal
               life and the help he needs.
               It is at this point that Enfield Council does not seem to want to reply to my son's solicitor's
               amended order that a two bedroom is looked into they have put everything else but that in
               there order, I am trying my hardest to work with everyone so my son gets the help that is
               needed and I do feel a two bedroom is needed so there can be someone for my son at all
               times as I feel that this is the best option for my son.
               If you can look into the amended order attached, I would be most grateful as I believe if it is
               added to the order it would give more weight when it goes to the panel on 28/09/2018.
               Regards
               Lorraine Cordell
               From: Trishna Kerai [mailto:Trishna@stuartmillersolicitors.co.uk]
               Sent: 17 September 2018 10:32
               To: 'Edmonton County, Enquiries'
   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824