Page 852 - 10. 2nd half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 852
Be the first to receive the latest Council news straight to your inbox
SIGN UPONL NENOW
www.enfieldgov.uk/enewsletters
Follow us on Facebook
Twitter
http://www.enfield.gov.uk
Enfield Council is committed to serving the whole borough fairly, delivering excellent
services and building strong communities. Opinions expressed in this email are those of the
individual and not necessarily those of the London Borough of Enfield. This email and any
attachments or files transmitted with it are strictly confidential and intended solely for the
named addressee. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you are not
the intended recipient and receive it in error you must not copy, distribute or use the
communication in any other way. All traffic handled by the Government Connect Secure
Extranet may be subject to recording/and or monitoring in accordance with relevant
legislation. This email has been scanned for viruses but we cannot guarantee that it will be
free of viruses or malware. The recipient should perform their own virus checks.
<LBE v Simon Cordell-E00ED049 Amended Order.docx>
3
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
1025. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._ LBE v Simon Cordell-E00ED049 Order 09082018_ (1)
/ Page Numbers: 4242,
From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 24 September 2018 18:01
To: 'Trishna Kerai'
Subject: FW: LBE v Simon Cordell-E00ED049 Order 09082018
Dear Trishna
Sorry to email you again this is the email I wanted to talk to you about, it would seem by the
date stated in the below email of the 6th September 2018, would mean that once you had
sent the amended order to Ludmilla instead of her contacting you regarding it she went
right to Edmonton Country Court and asked for her ordered to be sealed and sent out. This
is not acceptable and I am not happy I have spoken to Edmonton Country court and it is
100% Ludmilla order that the court has sealed. I would like to know what can be done about
this as I know the reason why Enfield Council has done this and it is not just about the two
bedroom it is about the discharged section also; the order was not discharged it was
dismissed at court. Can you get back to me regarding this?
Regards
Lorraine
From: Edmonton County, Enquiries mailto: enquiries.edmonton.countycourt@justice.gov.uk
Sent: 24 September 2018 14:41
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: RE: LBE v Simon Cordell-E00ED049 Order 09082018
Dear Mrs Cordell
Thank you for your email and your comments are noted. However, our records show that
the approved Order was sent to both parties on 6th September 2018. The Order was sent