Page 17 - 11. 2019 New 26-05-21 No Table

On 7 Jan 2019, at 11:13, Trishna Kerai <Trishna@stuartmillersolicitors.co.uk> wrote:
Hi Lorraine,
Thank you for your emails.
Please see emails attached sent to Ludmilla in relation to the below. Emails had been sent to
her and she did not respond confirming whether the amendments were accepted or not. The
only time we were waiting for your instructions were when we were waiting for an
amendment in the Order.
Kind regards,
Trishna Kerai | Caseworker | Magistrates Court Department
T: 0208 888 5225
M: 07790
E: trishna@stuartmillersolicitors.co.uk
W: www.stuartmillersolicitors.co.uk
4458,
From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 28 December 2018 14:14
To: Trishna Kerai
Subject: RE: Simon CordellE00ED049
Dear Trishna Kerai
I have sent some emails to you and I have had no replies regarding issues I am having
regarding the court order that was made on the
09/08/2018.
Today I got a letter from Enfield Council which stated that you agreed with Enfield Council
draft order on the
13/08/2018
but was waiting instructions from me.
Please see below
"In relation to the allegations made in regard to the draft Order submitted to the Court. Ms
lyavoo explains that she contacted Ms Trishna Kerai, of Stuart Miller Solicitors; the
caseworker instructed on behalf of Simon Cordell on 10th August 2018 and emailed her a
draft order. Ms lyavoo did not hear from Ms Kerai, so she emailed her again on 13th August
2018 and asked that she provides her agreement as soon as possible and if no response was
made by 4pm on the same day she will have to email the draft to the Judge. Ms lyavoo states
that she received a response from Ms Kerai on the same day stating that she was in agreement
with the order, but she was waiting for your instructions. As no response was forthcoming,
Ms lyavoo had to email the order to the Court on 15th. August 2018 and she also copied
Simon's caseworker to the email. Ms∙ Kerai has never indicated that she was on annual leave
during the time of the correspondence but confirmed that the delay was due to the receipt of
your instructions." I am very upset as you was well aware when you sent me the draft order
on the 13th August 2018 to me, I did not agree to it and you said you was going to try and
rewrite it that day, which was not done until after you came back from leave. So how is
Enfield Council blaming that on me saying you stated the delay was due to me not getting
back to you with instructions?
I am having a great deal of issues with Enfield Council they are not moving Simon and are
going to take him back to court to try and get his flat. They have not put the management
transfer application in front of the panel and are saying they will not do this. It seems due to
the way the court order was worded this is being put down to me, due to this section in the
order please see below. AND UPON the Defendants mother agreeing to engage with the
Enfield Mental Health Unit team so the Defendant could receive assistance with his mental
health conditions and housing. I know you feel that this was dealt with and you should not