Page 717 - 11. 2019 New 26-05-21 No Table

• 117 Burncroft Avenue
The 3rd set of Tenant’s since the Problems Started with the Flat being used as an
Offensives Weapons against my Person and against my free will.
has been “Re-Vacated” again by John Iron

59.
• Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:
59. 1. 1
Ronak @tyrerroxburgh.c Case - Withdrawal of the Case 2
31/10/2019
/ Page Numbers: 454,455

--

59.
Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:
59. 1. 1
Ronak @tyrerroxburgh.c Case - Withdrawal of the Case 2
31/10/2019
/ Page Numbers: 454,455
--
454,
From: Ronak Ahmed <ronak@tyrerroxburgh.co.uk>
Sent: 31 October 2019 14:36
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: RE: Your Son' Case - Withdrawal of the Case
Good afternoon
Thank you for your email dated 28 October 2019. You state “But I do think this is wrong that
Enfield Council has put this on my son when Enfield Council know at this point no-one has
been appointed for Simon by the court to act in his best interest. Enfield Council is well
aware as it has been stated in their application that my son lacks capacity to litigate and give
appropriate instructions in his defence.”. We cannot file a defence as the claim is being
terminated. If the case had continued, then we would have had to prepare and file a Defence
after the hearing in December 2019 - this is what I was expecting to occur.
I have let the Legal Aid Agency know of the Council’s offer to discontinue the claim. I will
telephone Simon Cordell in the next day or so (unless you come back to me first) and ask
again if he has changed his mind. The Agency are likely to terminate funding given the offer
received. I will then let the Council’s lawyer know of the decision of Simon. If the claim is
not agreed to be terminated, then at the next hearing the Judge will dismiss the Claim - as the
Council want. So by Simon refusing to agree to terminate, all that is occurring is that the
Council is being forced to attend the next hearing.
You also state in your above email “If Enfield Council have instructed their solicitors to
discontinue, they should just do this, and not put costs first over welfare knowing no one has
been appointed for Simon by the court at this stage.” This is not correct - if the Council
wishes to end the Claim, they have to obtain the Defendant’s consent or the permission of the
Court (The Council cannot just end the Claim). The latter option costs money as you can
appreciate in court fees etc. Therefore the Council wants an agreement to be reached without
a court hearing or having to ask the Court to end the claim- it is the cheaper option.
I would be grateful if you could explain this point to Simon the best you can.
Kind regards