Page 813 - 11. 2019 New 26-05-21 No Table

Neither my son nor his solicitors Tyrer Roxburgh Solicitors have seen this Consent Order so
could the court please forward it to this email as soon as possible.
th
Also within the Court order dated the 09 December 2019, Deputy District Judge Brown has
allowed the Claim Number FOOED222 to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore.
There is no date set by the court by which time The Mayor And Burgesses of the London
Borough of Enfield would need to restore this case, so in fact no End date for this Claim
Number FOOED222 it would seem it is an unlimited case with no time limited set by the
court.
How can this be allowed so by no date being placed on the court order, The Mayor And
Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield can wait five or Ten years or a lifetime and then
decide to being this case back to court whenever they wish to do so.
This is not acceptable by any means, and would never have been agreed, I do not understand
how a court could allow this.
My son is unwell which the court is aware, and to have this hanging over his head for the rest
of his life I believe is unlawful and would make my son’s health worse, knowing whenever
they want they can bring this case up again for the rest of his life.
District Judge Das warned The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield
about bring a Possession claim on the 09/08/2018. Yet all The Mayor and Burgesses of the
London Borough of Enfield did was wait some months and then submitted the Possession
claim to the court. Moreover, failed to comply with District Judge Das court order dated
09/08/2018.
The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield acting solicitors wrote to my
son’s solicitors Tyrer Roxburgh Solicitors the letter was dated 21/10/2019. The Mayor and
Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield had instructed their acting solicitors to
discontinue the claim on the basis that each party bears their own costs. In addition, that
could my son’s acting solicitors Tyrer Roxburgh Solicitors contact them as soon as possible
so a suitable worded consent order maybe agreed.
The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield would know my son is unwell
and that someone should have been placed to act in his best interest, this is listed on court
orders, from
813
516,
th
the court. This was due to happen on the 12 December 2019 hearing which Deputy District
Judge Brown has now vacated.
This is not the first time The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield has
submitted a draft court order, which was not agreed. The Mayor and Burgesses of the London
Borough of Enfield have had my son in the County Court at Edmonton three times different
Claim Numbers for the same said alleged allegations, since 2017. The last case was
dismissed, and The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield are in breach of
that court order. The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield was meant to
have moved my son yet have not; District Judge Das made this court order on the
09/08/2018.
th
My son has had no input regarding this court order dated 09 December 2019 that has been
made, under a consent order via Deputy District Judge Brown.
th
Therefore, I am asking for the court order dated the 09 December 2019 is Set Aside in Claim
Number FOOED222.
The court will have on file I Miss Lorraine Cordell has been trying to deal with cases for my
son Mr Simon Cordell and this will be on record at the court. Since legal Aid has been
withdrawn and The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield know this fact I
have been left to write this letter and try to deal with this serious matter.