Page 824 - 11. 2019 New 26-05-21 No Table

I am writing this email after I got a call from my son’s Mr Simon Cordell’s solicitor, Tyrer
th
Roxburgh Solicitors at around 17:20 hours on the 11 December 2019. The solicitors are no
longer acting due to legal aid being removed, which The Mayor and Burgesses of the London
Borough of Enfield are already aware of due to being told via my son’s solicitors.
th
I was informed that they had received a Court order today the 11 December 2019 regarding
th
the hearing, which was listed for 12 December 2019 at 2pm at the County Court at
Edmonton, under Claim Number FOOED222.
It would seem that The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield has
contacted the court via letter and a court order has been made on their behalf via Deputy
th
District Judge Brown on the 06 December 2019. Please see attached Court Order.
The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield sent a Consent Order received
by the Court on 5th December 2019, and this is how Deputy District Judge Brown made the
court order on the 06 December 2019.
th
I am upset regarding this Court Order, It is my believe a Consent Order would need to be
signed and agreed by all parties, in the Claim Number FOOED222, this has not happened
therefore I believe it is a Fraudulent Consent Order that has been submitted to the court,
which was never agreed to or signed.
I know my son Mr Simon Cordell also his solicitor Tyrer Roxburgh Solicitors have not
signed and agreed to any Consent Order for Claim Number FOOED222.
So how has, The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield sent a Consent
Order to the court, which was received by the Court on 5th December 2019. Then a court
order made from this Consent Order when only one party has signed it, no agreement made
by the parties involved in
824
529,
this case. It is me believe it is the rule of law that all parties have to agree and sign a Consent
Order for the court to be able to accept it.
Neither my son nor his solicitors Tyrer Roxburgh Solicitors have seen this Consent Order so
could the court please forward it to this email as soon as possible.
th
Also within the Court order dated the 09 December 2019, Deputy District Judge Brown has
allowed the Claim Number FOOED222 to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore.
There is no date set by the court by which time The Mayor And Burgesses of the London
Borough of Enfield would need to restore this case, so in fact no End date for this Claim
Number FOOED222 it would seem it is an unlimited case with no time limited set by the
court.
How can this be allowed so by no date being placed on the court order, The Mayor And
Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield can wait five or Ten years or a lifetime and then
decide to being this case back to court whenever they wish to do so.
This is not acceptable by any means, and would never have been agreed, I do not understand
how a court could allow this.
My son is unwell which the court is aware, and to have this hanging over his head for the rest
of his life I believe is unlawful and would make my son’s health worse, knowing whenever
they want they can bring this case up again for the rest of his life.
District Judge Das warned The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield
about bring a Possession claim on the 09/08/2018. Yet all The Mayor and Burgesses of the
London Borough of Enfield did was wait some months and then submitted the Possession
claim to the court. Moreover, failed to comply with District Judge Das court order dated
09/08/2018.
The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield acting solicitors wrote to my
son’s solicitors Tyrer Roxburgh Solicitors the letter was dated 21/10/2019. The Mayor and