Page 425 - tmp
P. 425

RESPONSE TO HHJ PAWLAK’S LETTER DATED 22  FEBRUARY
                                                                                        ND
                                                        2016



              (1)  WHAT INVOLVEMENT IN EACH EVENT (RAVE) RELIED ON BY THE RESPONDENT, THE
                  APPELLANT ADMITS TO HAVING HAD ANY INVOVMENT!

                  (A)  25.05.2014 – 5 ST GEORGES INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, WHITE HART LANE

                  The Appellant relies on his previous statement served.

                  The Appellant will state that he was delivering food to some homeless people.

                  The Appellant will state that there was no rave, no sound equipment, lights, generators etc
                  in his van.

                  The Appellant will state that there was no rave in progress and no intention for any event to
                  take place.

                  The Appellant will state that there was a section 144 LAPSO notice clearly displayed by the
                  occupants who were treating the premises as their home.

                  The Appellant will state that he had empty speaker cases in his van which would not have
                  been able to play any sound as they never had any drivers in the speaker boxes.  The van
                  was used to store the speakers.  The Appellant will state that he specifically requested that
                  the officers who attended note down the fact that he had only non-working speakers inside
                  his van and no other component parts for a sound system.

                                                                                             th
                  The Appellant will state that he did not commit any criminal offences on 25  May 2014.  The
                  Appellant will state that the premises were not broken into as alleged but were being legally
                  used as a home.  The Appellant will state that the occupation was legal by virtue of section
                  144 LAPSO notice being clearly displayed and this is within the law.

                  The Appellant will state that no Licensing authorisation was required as there was no music
                  being played or intended to be played.

                  The Appellant will state that he did not engage in any acts of Anti-social behaviour as
                  defined by section 1 of the Act.

                  The Appellant requests disclosure of the CCTV of the persons breaking in to the premises,
                  the CRIS and details of any persons arrested for criminal damage / burglary.

                                                                              th
                  The Appellant will state that he did not break any laws on 25  May 2014 nor did he engage
                  in any acts of anti-social behaviour.


                                                                 417


                                                                                                             1
   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430