Page 428 - tmp
P. 428

The Appellant will state that he was not an organiser and merely hired out his equipment in
                  good faith.

                  The Appellant did not commit any criminal offences.  The Appellant did not engage in any
                  anti-social behaviour.

                                       TH
                  (d)  CARPET RIGHT 19  JULY 2014

                  The Appellant denies organising or supplying equipment for the above event.

                  The Appellant never entered the premises Carpet Right.  The Appellant will state that the
                  true organisers were inside the premises and the police ought to be in possession of their
                  details.  This has never been disclosed to the Appellant.

                  The Appellant will state that none of his vehicles were inside the premises.

                  The Appellant notes from the Respondent’s bundle there was no rave /event, no sound
                  recording equipment inside the premises and therefore no rave was taking place.

                  The Appellant did not commit any criminal offences.  The Appellant did not engage in any
                  anti-social behaviour.



                                      TH
                  (e) ALMA ROAD – 24  JULY 2014

                  The Appellant disputes the conversation with PC Edgoose regarding raves.

                  The Appellant will state that he did discuss with PC Edgoose his entertainment company and
                  his dream of hosting a local festival at Pickets Lock for the benefit of the community.  He will
                  also say that he discussed other charitable events that he had participated in and events in
                  the pipeline.

                  The Appellant will state that this date should be struck from the Respondent’s bundle as
                  there was no rave / Event. The Appellant did not supply any sound recording equipment.

                  The admission of this disputed conversation is extremely prejudicial to the Appellant. The
                  Appellant finds it bizarre that he was not arrested for any criminal offences bearing in mind
                  the manner of driving described.  The Appellant will state that he did not engage in any anti-
                  social behaviour on this date.  The Appellant will also state that he was in his private motor
                  vehicle.

                                         th
                  (f) MILLMARSH LANE- 9  AUGUST 2014

                  The Appellant will state that he was invited to a private birthday party by one of the persons
                  occupying the premises at Millmarsh Lane, and that they had been occupying these
                  premises since before the 27/07/2014 which the police were aware off.


                                                     420                                                    4
   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433