Page 433 - tmp

RE: SIMON CORDELL V. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OF THE
METROPOLIS
APPEAL AGAINST THE IMPOSITION OF AN ASBO - 26 SEPTEMBER 2016 AT
TH
10:00 AM

To whom it may concern

I am writing this letter due to concerns of non-disclosure: -

The reasons of concern are as follows:

1. Since the start of the Asbo dated 12 September 20141 have been
th
explaining that the respondents application of an Asbo order should not
rely quote "That a case should not rely solely on hearsay" as mine seems
to do by police officer's with no witness present in court as I request to be,
so that my barrister can question the truth of their statements and even
further to the matter of witnesses I raise the concern of Most of the 999
intelligence calls being hearsay any case, reported by third party person

and therefore does carry less weight in any sense.

2. I also want to show the true facts of the case as for I am the one who is

suffering because of un true cut and paste facts that represent the basics
of the respondent case and that singed evidence being amongst other
fabricated statement such as police statements with different annually
incident dates but numeric order URN numbers,

3. I understand that a lot of the matters that should be dealt with at court
will be but only if the disclosure that the judge ordered is served in time
for appeal.

4. I still urge for a speedy and fair trial: and feel that when a judge asks the
respondent to reply by a set date such as the 1/08/2016 as the judge has
ordered to happen it should.

5. The respondent should do so within the time duration as dated
01/09/2016 and agreed by the judge and then received with the correct
response, as has not happened.

6. I have been awaiting the reply since 24/02/2016 from an ongoing civil

application that is dated 13 August 2014 so to be able to have a fair
th
trial up and till date.

425

1