Page 436 - tmp

I do insist for the challenges to be answered as it is my life that has been
tarnished for wrongful civil proceedings.

I feel that the meeting with my barrister has been left to the last minute to no
fault of my own I have been requesting this to be accomplished in a multitude
of emails well in advance to the date that has now been made a few days
before appeal.

I do not see how the case will not get re listed due to lack of late disclosure to
be quite frank due to no fault of my own but still at my life's expense.

I do not feel that it is right or fair that I am being encouraged to go to appeal
and my requests to the respondent not being replied to in time, that I believe
will prove my innocents and will also clearly draft out the police corruption
and wrongful conditions that I know have been imposed on myself.

All Legal professionals should work in Co Hurst towards the understanding of
noun precedent in relation to the weight of any evidence put towards a client.
I am concerned about the case relying sole on hearsay by police. Is this correct in
procedure?

I do also understand and take note from the respondent’s bundle that all resident
parties contained within, were held on single occasions and in places of residence
and where not held as a running commercial business by the occupiers or by
myself to my knowledge. This has leaded me to read that any person is entitled to
have a house or resident party in private air under the licensing act 2003 or where
they reside. To my understanding each accused incident in the respondents
bundle is a place of residence and was in fact different people holding their own
private parties at their places of residence.

Aloe there may have been complaints in regards to issues of concern about them
house parties I was not the occupier to any of the accused locations; neither was I
the hirer of equipment and surely not the organiser.

I was establishing a hire company around the dates of the accused events and
have provided evidence of the work I had been committing myself to. I was not
trading at the time and whenever hiring out equipment I do with due care and
responsibility, however I do not accept responsibility for other people's actions
when hiring out such equipment in good faith. I do take legal action for any
persons when breaking my terms and conditions. I do not hire out equipment to
any person without being in the constraints of the law and in good business
practice or without the correct ID.

On one occasion I did hire out a sound system in good faith on a pro bono basis,
this being of the understanding that no laws were being broken and as an Ltd

428
4