Page 431 - tmp

The Appellant will argue that the court was wrong in principle in granting the original ASBO
application as the Respondent made the original application based on the Applicant being involved
in illegal raves. The Respondent did not establish this at the initial hearing and the District Judge
erred in granting this ASBO.

The Appellant questions the facts of their being so many inconsistencies contained within the police
statements, as can be recognized by so many irregularities that he knows that he has not committed
nor has he had the right to challenge under the criminal justice acts.

The Appellant feels the need to defend his legal rights against such allegations of illegal statements
and so many irregularities within the case put against him, made by police officers against himself
the same as he would if the allegations were made by any member(s) off the public such as offences
off (organizing illegal raves) In the understanding of civil and criminal law.

The Appellant has learnt in the understanding off all criminal cases were some think is alleged to
have taken place that is said to have been illegal the correct Police procedure in them
circumstances is that a crime will be created under the crime and disorder act 1998 by way of a
victim or witness making a report then members of the police will be allocated to the incident and
start investigations depending on the matter of relevance to the initial report to the resources
available at the time.

The investigations may lead to an arrest what will lead the detainee to his or her statuary legal
rights.

If charged any persons rights are gained under section 24 and 25 which does relate to the rights of
any person charged and the minimum standards of criminal procedure. But my case seems to sit in it
civil capacity at court with none of the above regulations and my rights being carried out in
accordance of the United Kingdom laws; please can you explain this to me?

It has been noted and said by PC. Parcel that the Applicants is known for class A drugs and or
supplying drugs this was proved not to be true as can be read in a copy of the magistrates court
transcripts and that of the district judge agreeing to take no weight in such statements, why has this
not yet been deducted?

The Appellant feels as if he is now left with not understanding, with what has been proven against
him and what he needs to prove for his appeal. As the conditions he is prohibited from doing is all
for illegal raves and illegal raves were not proven.

It is unjustified also that The Appellant’s name has been slandered in the metropolitan police
website, stating that he was given an ASBO for organizing illegal raves, when the case for the ASBO
was not proven for organizing illegal raves.

The Appellant understands that it was proven, that he had acted in an Anti-social manner, to which
if justice profiles he intends to prove his innocence at his appeal.

The Appellant address was put into the metropolitan police website stating that illegality had been
proven in the case of illegal raves, which the prosecution rest there case upon. It has also been
stated that The Appellant is well known for organizing illegal raves in Enfield and across London, to
which he has never been arrested for any think of that nature or been found guilty off.

423

7