Page 437 - tmp

company acting responsible. I know that I should not be liable for them persons
actions when hiring out equipment and having the correct protocols in place as I
clearly do.

I do not feel that it is right for the respondent to obtain criminal punishments
such as section 63 of the Crime and Disorder act 1994 and for that section to be
then imposed against my freedom of movement & other Human Right

that have been breached by being pro-claimed under wrongful civil proceedings,
as I have now suffered to a multitude of incorrect procedures, legalisation and
wrongful claims that I have occurred, for instance I have no previous nurtured
offences of a similar sort as required by law when applying a standalone Asbo on
a person’s statue, as I do feel I should have. Also, the case has made me feel that I
have not had the right to challenge the allegations under a true Criminal
investigation, especially when referring to the Organisation of Illegal Raves as the
respondent has clearly headlined the offence to be.

I also have the listed concerns of: -
1. I understand that the correct protocols for the offences I am being
accused of should be carried out in a manner to be of a high professional
standard as required by law, so for me to be able to defended myself.
2. I am therefore not happy with the issues of police corruption not being
addressed, by all legal persons, as I know I cannot stand a fair trial or appeal
without them issues being rectified first.
3. I have suffered since 2014 for conditions that have been wrongful imposed
upon myself and still awaiting an appeal.

1.1 Me and my acting solicitor drafted a letter requesting the respondent
to remove any CADS that have been placed in the Asbo bundle, as I understand
that the cads are already inputted incorrectly, leading to the further
understanding that I could not have and did not commit the alleged offices that I
have been accused of as a fast majority of the other CADS contained within the
application are incorrect and them cads do have some blocked out context; such
as the Att Locations that are redacted and the intelligence reports grid references
do state Crown road and other locations such as Hardy Way, on the same day as
progress way so I could not have committed as I could not be in two places at
once.
1.1.1 However, I am even further worried about CADS such as all the listed
and any in the format such as fully retracted where know person can or is able to
see the true CAD intelligence in regards to the wrongful fabricated claims being
held against my person, so for all to be able to see the truth.

1.1.2 I do believe when all CADS do get retracted and un blocked then that
will help any barrister and put them in a better position to defend me, so for all
Cads and pages in the Asbo application being served in an un edited format and

429 5