Page 441 - tmp

why Steven Elsmore deleted emails that was sent to DS Val Tanner and received from DS Yal Tanner and he only
felt the need to do an updated statement dated 26/06/2015 in regards to this what did he ask DS Val Tanner and
what was he told?
Why a statement was never asked from, from DS Chapman of the public order unit Scotland Yard who when he
spoke to Miss Lorraine Cordell on the phone checked their system and told Miss Lorraine Cordell that Mr Simon
th
Cordell name was only listed on their systems once and that was the day he was arrested on the 19 July 2014, so
how Steve Elsmore can put in his updated statement that the public Order Unit hold no information about Mr
Simon Cordell and Enfield is beyond me.

Why there are no pocket books of any police officers in the Respondent original application bundle.

Why the Respondent original application that we collected on the 23/09/2016 from the solicitor’s officer that was
served by the Respondent in January 2016 to the court and the solicitors office, that we kept asking for from the
solicitors and never got, has updated statements we have never seen dating back before the trial in the lower court.

In a letter you wrote on the 22/02/2016 you asked the Respondent in section 5 (Please see below) this has never
been done and we have never received this information by the Respondent.

"51 The Respondent is to serve by the 4th April 2016 a hearsay notice identifying
by
reference to pages of Bundle R what hearsay it wishes to rely on and why it should
be admitted in evidence”
The abuse of process is a great concern in regarding the Appellant’s right to a fair trial.
The evidences brought against the Appellant are not credible enough to prove the Respondent’s application
beyond reasonable doubt

Prosecution’s failure to prove the Respondent’s application will entitle him an acquittal from Respondent’s
application.
At this stage I ask Your Honour to discharge acquit this Appeal case for an anti-social behaviour order (ASBO) in
favour of the Appellant Mr Simon Cordell, and if this cannot be done the case be adjourned until matters in this
letter are addressed and the Appellant Mr Simon Cordell can have a fair trial, but the conditions he is on for this
ASBO removed.

Yours Sincerely

Miss Lorraine Cordell

433