Page 444 - tmp

officer’s codes of conduct, neither does the CPS challenge or dispute this fact, so there is no argument to the
issue of illegality under the trespass grounds.

This only leaves the licensing act 2003 having to be found in breach to prove the word illegal in the
entertainment industry when a police officer is in pursuit of a case relating to the investigation of the
organisation of illegal raves, as the respondent and officers have pro claimed it to be.

th
When reading a copy of the licensing act 2003 as amended on the 7 January 2013 for the processes of creation
of an investigation or defence towards a persons rights, any person doing so will have to take note to appendix
four of that Act, which clearly states it is not illegal to provide any entertainment within a back garden or place
of residence, in fact the only clause relating to in private air is that no person shall have the right to charge for
money with a few of making a profit and if a profit is made without true intention then the licensing act 2003 has
no breach, with this full and whole understanding I believe that any person will agree that the respondent does
not have the right to base there case on the fact of organising an illegal rave as no illegal concept has been
adduced to be proven.

Issue’s of the Word “Illegal being Used: -

As a third concern regarding the issue of the word “illegal being used does also make me take reference to the
following:

From the early stages of the application the Appellant felt the need to defend his legal right’s, as any other
member of united kingdom and associated treaties should also do, this being said to be leading towards the
wrongful accusations against any illegal allegations off criminal nature that any person(s) find themselves in
defence towards, that any person(s) know they have not committed, neither am I in the wrong for just simply not
understanding the crime I am being accused of but still playing a role in such criminal activities in turn as a
figure of speech being blind towards my own actions and there consequences, such as the incident that have
clearly been contained within the Antisocial Behaviour Order (ASBO) application.

I know it would be morally wrong for me not to stand up and quire this matter myself as for I know the true
facts, as I know this case should not be sitting in its civil capacity, when it clearly states an offence of an illegal
natured concept this is a breach of a multitude of my human rights and should be managed under criminal
legalisation and regulations in a criminal court, especially with out no previous history of similar natured
offences being present and this is also inclusive of no pre remand warnings ever being issued. In the
understanding of civil and criminal law, were some think is alleged to have taken place that is said to have been
illegal the correct Police procedure in them circumstances is that a crime will be created under the crime and
disorder act 1998, in pursuit from the police reforms act 1964, by way of a victim or witness making a report to
police and then for members of the police to be allocated the incident in hand so for them to be able to start any
needed investigations, this does also depend on the matter of relevance to the initial report and will be risk
assessed and graded apriority to the listing to the resources available at the time.

The investigations may lead to an arrest what will lead the detainee to his or her statuary legal rights. In the early
1980’s the police did have the power to take cases to court without the decision of any other governing body, but
now in 2016 the burden relays solely on the CPS who are in collaboration with Revenue and Customs
Prosecution Office and is headed by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) who is independent but subject to
the superintendence of the Attorney General that is accountable to members of Parliament that do work for the
prosecution services. If charged any person’s rights are gained under section 24 and 25 which does relate to the
rights of any person charged and the minimum standards of criminal procedure.

An issue I raise is my case seems to sit in it civil capacity at court with none of the above regulations and my
rights being carried out with accordance of the United Kingdom laws; as it clearly is stated as an illegal offence,
I ask please can any person explain this to me? As I have no previous convictions of similar nature offence,
neither was the Antisocial Behaviour Order (ASBO) application a CBO, Antisocial Behaviour Order (ASBO) on
conviction, it is in fact a stand alone Antisocial Behaviour Order (ASBO) and the legal guidance is for the
application not to be based upon criminal natured activities.

Before I continue with the principles of the respondent’s case which has been educed with the title of “the
organisation of illegal raves, so to highlight the true aspects of the legal definition needed to be met in reference

3
436