Page 377 - tmp

There is also nothing to show any work was carried out on the building from 16/02/2013 so show anything was
fixed as I am sure there should have been.

There is far to much data that is missing.

And I wonder why how can a police officer not have any full lists of items that were taken yet be able to have a
total amount of damage that were caused how could they come to these sums?

There seems to me a lot in this case is being covered up by the police and I would like this addressed as how
can someone have a fair tail without the full facts.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [mailto:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 November 2013 17:30
To: too smooth; Lorraine Cordell
Subject: CPS response to secondary disclosure and confirmation of conference

Dear Simon / Lorraine

Please see the CPS response to our defence case statement. This was received in the DX today. It
does not advance our case.

I am also confirming that your barrister can only do a conference on 12th December 2013 at 10am at
Nexus Chambers. He has personal appointments tomorrow and can not as previously advised to a
conference at Croydon Crown Court. I have therefore booked a fixed conference for 12th December
2013 at 10am at Nexus Chambers so that he will not be caught up in a trial and there is no risk of you
breaching your curfew.

Before that date I would also like to finalise your proof of evidence and I would hope to do that
Tuesday afternoon or the following Monday.

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any further questions regarding this case.

Regards

Josephine

355