Page 378 - tmp
P. 378

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
            Sent: 16 December 2013 13:06
            To: 'josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com'
            Subject: FW: Meeting with barristerSimon Cordell
            Hi Josey

            Please still read the below email.

            But I also forgot to say that the barrister also said Simon needs to go over the tapes of his interview and highlight
            and mark anything that is wrong.

            Also can I ask will the PNC check be updated as Simon has been found not guilty for at least 4 of the cases that
            show on there? So his last case should show as 2009.

            Lorraine


            From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
            Sent: 16 December 2013 12:43
            To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'
            Subject: RE: Meeting with barristerSimon Cordell

            Hello Josey

            After Simon went to see the barrister on 13/12/2013 the barrister cannot do anything for Simon until
            at least 18/12/2013 as he is on a next case.

            He also did not know anything about Simon case and had not had any papers from you.

            He has asked Simon for some information here is the list

            Anything from 16/02/2013 case including all

            All Cads
            List of items that were taken
            List of all damage to building
            And anything else to do with that case
            All crime scene pictures
            And any insurance claims

            He also said he will need the same for the 04/05/2013 case

            All Cads
            List of items that were taken
            List of damage to building
            And anything else for that case
            And any insurance claims

            As the invoices that have been given are hear say due to the fact the guy would need proof that these
            items where still in fact inside the warehouse

            He does not seem to understand when this went to court and the judge said that we can’t have this
            information. So could you please talk with him and update him as to what has gone on at the court, as
            we did not know until last week that the judge had said this we cant have this information.

            But at any case it seems the barrister needs updating about this case as he does not know anything and
            did not even understand why Simon had gone to see him when he was on a case already which was
                                                     356
   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383