Page 446 - tmp
P. 446

would go for a possession order to the judge because she did not get what she wanted.

           There is also the fact that my son was willing to stay in Hospital when he was sectioned on the
           25/10/2018, it was the hospital that discharged him on the 15/11/2018 due to not getting the section 3
           on my son they wanted, that was heard on the 14/11/2018, my son said as soon as he knew they was
           not allowing the section 3 on the 14/11/2018 that they would kick him out of the hospital, as this is
           what they did in 2016, and the next day the 15/11/2018 that is what the doctors did kicked him out the
           hospital, yet my son was willing to stay and build trust up with the doctors and the mental health
           team, which had broken down due to what has been ongoing for sometime.
           Which in fact would have been a lot better as if he had been allowed to stay in hospital like he wanted
           maybe by now they would have been trust built up with the doctors and teams, this is what Soohah
           Appadoo wanted to do as he saw that there was a real problem with trust and stated this at the appeal
           on the section 2 at the hearing. On the 15/12/2018 I myself spoke to Soohah Appadoo on the phone,
           but since that we have heard nothing from him is this what is being called support put in place when
           my son was discharged from hospital?

           This misleading information needs to stop as it is a beach of the data protection act.

           I look forward to hearing from you regarding this, please can you reply as I did not get a reply from
           you to my last email I sent to you.


           Regards


           Lorraine Cordell












































                                                    4424
   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451