Page 448 - tmp

AND UPON the Defendants mother agreeing to engage with the Enfield Mental Health Unit
team so the Defendant could receive assistance with his mental health conditions and housing.

The order was to be agreed with my son’s solicitor upon being drafted by Enfield Council, but my
son’s solicitor was on annual leave and therefore did not reply to Enfield Council order until she came
back of leave, But when you emailed her it came back that she was on annual leave so Enfield
Council was well aware of this.
Upon her return from annual leave her amended order was sent over to Ludmilla Iyavoo, which my
son’s solicitor never had a reply back from Ludmilla Iyavoo regarding her amended order, but some
days after the amended order was sent over to Ludmilla Iyavoo, it seems an order was sealed at
Edmonton Country Court which was not agreed on which was Enfield Council drafted order, which
we never agreed to and feel it is misleading as to what was said in court.

I believe a lot of what was said in court is not being told and misleading information is being said,
maybe someone should ask Ludmilla Iyavoo what the judge said when Ludmilla Iyavoo said she
would go for a possession order to the judge because she did not get what she wanted.

There is also the fact that my son was willing to stay in Hospital when he was sectioned on the
25/10/2018, it was the hospital that discharged him on the 15/11/2018 due to not getting the section 3
on my son they wanted, that was heard on the 14/11/2018, my son said as soon as he knew they was
not allowing the section 3 on the 14/11/2018 that they would kick him out of the hospital, as this is
what they did in 2016, and the next day the 15/11/2018 that is what the doctors did kicked him out the
hospital, yet my son was willing to stay and build trust up with the doctors and the mental health
team, which had broken down due to what has been ongoing for sometime.
Which in fact would have been a lot better as if he had been allowed to stay in hospital like he wanted
maybe by now they would have been trust built up with the doctors and teams, this is what Soohah
Appadoo wanted to do as he saw that there was a real problem with trust and stated this at the appeal
on the section 2 at the hearing. On the 15/11/2018 I myself spoke to Soohah Appadoo on the phone,
but since that we have heard nothing from him is this what is being called support put in place when
my son was discharged from hospital?

This misleading information needs to stop as it is a beach of the data protection act.

I look forward to hearing from you regarding this, please can you reply as I did not get a reply from
you to my last email I sent to you.

Regards

Lorraine Cordell

4426