Page 383 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

I work for KGM Motor Insurance, an Insurance Company based in London. I am an
Operations Manager working for UK Specialty, Canopius. KGM is a member of the
Canopius Group in the UK Specialty Division. I am responsible for managing the timely and
accurate processing of all client records supplied to us via our Broker network.
Josephine Ward of Michael Carroll & Co (with Simon & Lorraine Cordell’s permission)
contacted me on the 8/2/2015 requesting a statement in respect of relevant recorded calls
supplied plus a Letter of
indemnity pertaining to Mr Simone Cordell’s policy number MT3574694.1 understand the
statement request is connected to an appeal against conviction for no insurance, Regina v.
Simon Paul Cordell
to be heard on the 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court.
I would confirm that -
1. The policy was incepted on the 23/2/2013 allowing Mr Simon Cordell only to drive at
Comprehensive cover
2. The vehicles covered at inception were -

• Ford Zetec registration MA57LDY.
• Ford Transit registration CX52JRZ.
• Use allowed was Social Domestic & Pleasure & or Motor Trade purposes only.
KGM Motor Insurance KGM House 14 Eastwood Close South Woodford London E18 1RZ
UK
T +44 (0)20 8530 7351
F +44 (0)20 8530 8547
T +44 (0)844 412 6412
Claims F +44 (0)20 8530 7037
Claims www.kgminsurance.co.uk
www.canopius.com
Registered in England and Wales No 01514453 Registered Office Gallery 9 One Lime Street
London EC3M 7HA KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name tor business written by
Syndicate 260 which is managed by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Authorised by the
Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the
Prudential Regulation Authority
203,
KGM
I have become involved in this matter following receipt of a Data Subject Access request and
a complaint letter from Simon and Lorraine Cordell. During the course of my investigations
to establish all the facts before responding to the letter of complaint it has been necessary for
me to obtain and listen to various phone calls between the client and Underwriters, the Broker
and Underwriters, Underwriters and the Police compound and the original call from the
officer at the roadside and Underwriters.
I feel I have now reached a good understanding of the sequence of events and as a result have
provided both a Letter of Indemnity and 2 relevant call recordings to Lorraine and Simon
Cordell to support their appeal.
Josephine Ward has requested that in addition to this I provide a section 9 statement and
confirm the following points -
3. I have been able to search and locate, I believe, all of the relevant call recordings
connected to this matter. I have located in total 8 call recordings but have provided the 2
relevant calls being the call from the officer at the roadside talking to Underwriters and
the call from Underwriters to the Police compound. The fact that I have been able to
search for and locate these calls proves to me that our call recording equipment was