Page 447 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 447

Please can you let me know if we should attend at 16:30 hours as I need to leave to pick
               Simon up to get him there on time.
               Also please see attached draft copy
               Regards
               Lorraine
               199,
               I note that I have not received the updated statement from Simon, nor any additional
               statements from any witnesses re Dwayne's leaving party. I advised you previously that
               Dwayne was required to attend court, clearly, he cannot as he is travelling, hence the request
               for alternative witnesses to back up Simon's alibi.
               If the updated statement is not received by 3.30pm then I will have to re-schedule the meeting
               for until such time as the updated statement is received.
               Regards
               Josephine
               200,
               This document is only for Simon Cordell Solicitors to see as Simon is not a Solicitor and
               needs help to address what sections need to be placed in his updated statement and which
               parts will be used for his barrister at the appeal. This is a draft copy of what can be included
               to make a new updated statement and notes which the barrister will need to see.
               Witness statement in pursuit of Civil Proceedings Ci Act 1967, s;9; Mc Act 1980, ss.5A (3)
               and 5B.
               Criminal Procedure Rules 2005, Rule 27.1
               Introduction:
               -       An ASBO order has been appealed against after the magistrates court, the decision
               had been made against Mr Simon Cordell, this was at Highbury Corner, Magistrates Court,
               on the 4th August 2015 in pursuant to s.1 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 this is to make
               him subject to an Anti-Social behaviour order in order, for the Commissioner of Police of the
               Metropolis.
               -       The respondent’s case is that Our Client that we represent, has been accused of being
               integrally involved in the organisation of illegal raves in Enfield on the dates listed below that
               are in question by the applicant.
               12/01/2013
               That Mr Simon Cordell had been involved in the organisation of and / or supplied equipment
               for and / or attended an illegal rave at Canary Wharf.
               24/05/2013
               That Mr Simon Cordell had been involved in looking for venues, to set up an illegal rave.
               25/05/2014 That Mr Simon Cordell had been involved in the organisation of and / or supplied
               equipment for and / or attended an illegal rave at Unit 5, St George’s Industrial Estate, White
               Hart Lane, N17.
               07/06/2014
               That Mr Simon Cordell had been involved in the organisation of and / or supplied equipment
               for and / or attended an illegal rave at an empty warehouse on progress way, Enfield.
               20/06/2014 That Mr Simon Cordell had been involved in the organisation of and / or supplied
               equipment for and / or attended an illegal rave at 1 Falcon Park, Neasden Lane,
               NW10.
               19/07/2014
               That Mr Simon Cordell had been involved in the organisation of and / or supplied equipment
               for and / or attended an illegal rave at the Carpet Right Showroom on the A10 Great
               Cambridge Road, Enfield.
               24/07/2014
   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452