Page 450 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Authority permission as stated by the applicant, in today’s modern society, as it is stated he
would have to ask any owner to see there licensed to make sure when listen to music with
less than 500 people, this should only be defined under section 63 of the crime and disorder
Act, as in open Air or when Trespass has taken place.
Skeleton argument, that has been provided by the applicant on page number (5 module 18),
I have never been spoken to by the police or anyone else about my behaviour, before this
ASBO was served on me. I feel very upset by the words in this section as I feel that the police
are trying to say they have spoken to me about problems they have included in this ASBO
which is not the case.
Skeleton argument, that has been provided by the applicant on page number (5 module 19),
I did not do the acts that the police have set out in this ASBO and I believe the police are well
aware off this. We have said over and over in this case that the public order unit holds
information to the real people who did what the police are saying I have done in this ASBO
application.
No one wanted to define the conditions the applicant wanted to make this a life time ASBO
and applied for the conditions on the day of trial but was denied by the Judge it was also said
that after the 5 years, the applicant can apply to put a next 5 years in place because the judge
would only allow the 5 years imposed and not the life time ASBO which covers the whole
UK..
An Anti-Social Behaviour Order should be given as the final resort, before an ASBO is
considered to be put in placed on any person. Other methods should have been tried to as
before the court proceedings in any ASBO
450
203,
Edited part 5.pdf
application to aid in bringing about a solution depending on the offence that has been
committed; this is especially in cases of unlicensed activities. These solutions should have
included the possibility of mediation, warning letters and Acceptable Behaviour Contracts
(ABC). An ABC is classed as a written agreement between any Known persistent offenders,
to which Simon Cordell has never been arrested to any think of similar nature in fact the last
time Mr Cordell was arrested, was in 2009. He has also never been spoken to by anyone
about any concerns they had.
If illegal raves have not been proven which it was not the Judge said no illegality needed to
be proven, then why do my conditions for the ASBO still define illegal raves?
Please see article from The World Wide Web at:
http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN01889/SN01889.pdf
What is stated in the PDF web linked above is typed below:
Under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, the police have the power to stop
raves. Until January 2004, these were defined as unlicensed open-air gatherings of 100 or
more people at which loud music is played during the night. New provisions introduced into
the Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003, which came into effect in January 2004, reduced the
number of people who constitute a rave from 100 to 20, and removed the requirement for the
gathering to be in the open air. It also introduced an offence of attending another trespassory
rave within 24 hours of a police direction, to stop people simply moving the rave to another
place. There have been press reports of police in some areas holding back from using their
powers for health and safety reasons, either because of the dangers of dispersing large crowds
in the dark or because of other dangerous local conditions. However, there have also been
reports of successful police action to control raves in particular areas. Gatherings for which
an entertainment licence has been obtained are not counted as raves within the meaning of the
legislation. However, there was some controversy about so-called licensed “raves” under