Page 628 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half
P. 628

The Anti-Social Behaviour Order Case and the Verdict got made Guilty against me in
                             error and the conditions got imposed against me till late 2020!
                                               The Banging Continued: -
                                                       29/05/2017

               •  Disrepair!
               •  The Asbo Order got granted in Error with Full Conditions against me and Fraudulently!
               •  The banging Continued at me!

               •  George Quinton
                   got involved in assaulting me with his friends!

               •  Working at home!

               •  Response to the Judge’s Ruling: --
                   On the 04/08/2015

               •  1 x Email
                   To the Judge from me!

               --

               1

                              Response to the Judge’s Ruling: --

                 On the
                 04/08/2015
                 04th August 2015
                 the District Judge at High bury Comer Magistrates’ Court made
                 an antisocial behaviour order, an ASBO, against Simon
                 Cordell.   It is a clear fact that the appellant has disputed that
                 the two-part test in section 1(1) of the 1998 Crime and disorder
                 Act has been satisfied correctly in law. He continues to contest
                 his innocents in any Anti-Social Behaviour acts. He states that
                 he was not intentionally or otherwise involved neither was he
                 part responsible for any harassment, alarm or distress that was
                 or is said to have been caused. The prosecution explains that
                 they have belief of some form of direct evidence and a lot of
                 hearsay evidence to obtain a fair guilty verdict against Mr.
                 Simon Cordell,  This is not the case as for fact the evidenced in
                 the case is circumstantial and does not give any relevance
                 towards the true on goings of incidents being accused upon the
                 appellant as sighted in the Asbo application, I find it difficult to
                 apprehend because the case as stated in the Asbo application is
                 based solely on hearsay evidence at page number (000) and the
                 rest of my findings below in this official document and
                 therefore question the reliability of the prosecution supported
                 evidence. When applying the bill of acts of law referring to
   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633