Page 630 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

the guidelines for making a successful Asbo so for the police to
have powers of arrest and to prevent a breach of the peace on
and in private land, if a member of the public issues a truthful
complaint that can be proved beyond reasonable doubt, then the
council and police can work in collaboration with them or that
victim(s) and create a successful Asbo application governed
under Asbo legal guidance, as seems to not of happened in this
case. It is also questionable whether a gathering of 20 or more
people in private air can be classed as a rave as for in private air
was never omitted out of the raves bill 1994, giving the people
the power to their own freedom of rights when not in the public
domain and providing entertainment to themselves or guest. As
noted on page (420 and 000, 000 in the applicants response
bundle) it has also been noted that It is for the police to prove
that when dealing with issues of concerns relating to
entertainment when in private dwellings it is for them to follow
the right line of investigation and in this instance that would
have been to find a breach under the licensing act 2003.

The district Judge: --
On the
04/08/2015
The district Judge was in error in her point of law at the hearing
of the Asbo application at the trial of the applicant, this is In
respect to the licensing act 2003 regarding in private air and in
public air as she does not mention profit to which is the only
requirement to be restricted as stated in a copy of the court
transcripts provided.
Quoted;
District Judge States; “are you aware that music is a licensed
activity and believes you need a music license to play music?”
Mr. Simon Cordell states; “I would need a license for both
premises.”
District Judge States; Yes
Mr. Simon Cordell States; “I would not check if lending
equipment to a private party.”
What does clearly state as follows;