Page 634 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

have been changed since the prosecution updated their files. There are
seven cad that are not relating to progress way and seven of them are for
Crown Road and are believed to have been imputed in the development of
the Asbo application to deceive the judge and applicant. The prosecution
since the start of the case have implied that they have witness and them
witness do not want to attend court to give evidence so to be questioned by
the applicants barrister on the day of trial, they further explained in a copy
of the official court transcripts of the days at trial at Highbury Magistrates
court dated
00/00/2014
and also, in the following: -
1.
2.
3.
But It is a pity of course that none of the people whose sleep in particular
was disturbed during this three-day or two-day event felt able to give
evidence.
They all wanted anonymity.
They all refused to give evidence,
It has been said that in
August 2014
various police officers went to the makers of them cad 999 calls in order to
obtain further evidence as to what they had been complaining about. As I
said before, none of the complainants wanted to or have given evidence,
but the police took hearsay, as it were, evidence from them by way of more
detail as to what had been going on.
All of that is contained in divider 20 of the respondent's bundle and again it
paints an entirely convincing picture of what was going on during this rave.
Cad Date Start End Grid Ref Location Page Num
Time Time
1012 7 01:53 01:56 534380,195513 Outside 155 to 158
June Progress
14 Way Esso
1323 7 2:41 02:56 534152,195940 Lincolin 159 to 163
June Way
14
1722 7 3:58 04:11 Blocked out Blocked 164 to 166
June out
14 “Crown
Rd”
1816 7 4:15 04:27 534380,195513 Inside 167 to 171
June Progress
14 Way “Pc
Shinnick”
2141 7 5:50 05:59 531438,197711 Hardy 172 to 176
June Way
14
2255 7 06:24 06:31 534144,195627 Leighton 177 to 181
June Rd Bush
14 Hill Park