Page 639 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

something that is likely to be impossible and with the portionality of
evidence that the applicant has showed in the balance of justice to be of
this nature that is to say corrupt practice of members of the Metropolises
Police force Constabulary his statements are more than likely to be 100%
correct. The prosecution also wanted to deal with another theme which
they say seems to surfaces repeatedly in the submissions made by or on
behalf of the appellant in this case, namely that there are errors in the
police national computer record, which was produced at some stage in
these proceedings, and continue to say that this “certainly does not and we
are totally disinterested in whether he has any previous convictions for any
sort of offence.” Why has the applicant not adduced and removed cases
that when the Asbo application was in development was clearly added
incorrectly? Relating to incident’s that can and have been proved to be in
error in the defendant’s response bundle. I feel strongly that this does have
a huge relevance in the ongoing of this case at present as for sure the
prosecution surely understands that a bad character application should have
been made under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and must be submitted to
the judge beforehand so for any person(s) copy of their criminal record to
be contained within any case files such as the Asbo application, as the case
must be met to the criminal standard of law as has not happened here from
the start of proceedings. The prosecution also states that they would like to
deal with the fact that the applicant has no previous convictions in
particular for drug offences and state: “that this seems to be something that
he brings up of his concern with no relevance in this Asbo case.” The
reason that the appellant has brought this up is because on the day of trial
at the Magistrates court dated
00/00/2014
his barrister put forward a line of investigation to officers involved in the
case and asked the following as noted in the court transcripts; - “this is
another example of doings put in statements to blacken Mr. Cordell’s
evidence in statement @ point 12, (No evidence of convictions that of class
A drugs) unlike what’s written in Statements – another example of untrue
cut and paste.
DJ: - Ill ignore that, because there is no convections of class A drugs or
supplying present on the criminal record.
The prosecution claim: - that “what matters in this case is whether the
respondent has made out the grounds for obtaining the ASBO.
The existence of previous convictions, whether correctly recorded or
incorrectly recorded, is, I repeat again, totally irrelevant. In response the
applicant does not feel that the grounds for obtaining an Asbo have been
met and a bad character application should have been made under the
Criminal Justice Act 2003 in any sense and feels that this wrongfully paints
him to be a person of bad character, there is the worry issue that the
prosecution claim that on the
07/06/2014
07th June 2014
when the applicant was not present at Progress Way that there were
suggestions made that antisocial activity, such as the sale and taking of
drugs were also taking place this. The applicant contest that he took no part
in any drug related activities. The appellant would like to confirm that