Page 644 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

had followed him, as he had seen them pay attention to himself
as he had driven past.
The applicant does remember clearly that of himself locking his
vehicle as the police approached him and now was standing by
his side.
He states that this is normal for him and over the years of his life
he has become use to the police approaching him on numerous
accusations this has made him used to their presents.
The Applicant states that the police pulling him over are normal
days for him, on this occasion he got ready for the police
procedures as they said they wanted to search him and his car
because the police believed that the car he was driving smelt
strongly of cannabis, the Applicant sates that he always consents
to this.
The Applicant is sure of his statements of facts and that the
police cannot dispute this, that of the police officers that had
approached him and who had stopped him as he had just got out
of his car, or how would they have said his car smelt strongly of
cannabis, which is the reason that the police officers gave him
the conditions of search and their consent form due to a search of
himself and that of his vehicle that he was driving.
The Applicant will state; “that he had not done anything wrong
and nothing was found on his person or in his car.”
The Applicant will dispute making any comments about being
able to attract people to illegal raves and illegal three-day events,
what reason would he have had to say this.
The Applicant will state that he was a visitor to the location of
interest, due to a call from a friend who asked if the Applicant
could loan him some money for food.
The Applicant does not know what Joshua said to the police, as
he was never with Joshua.
The Applicant does not know why Joshua would have said to the
police that he was his lawyer, or if Joshua said this at all to
police.
The Applicant has tried to get hold of Joshua to make a
statement for this case, but due to him being homeless, it has
been very hard.
As far as he is aware the building was being occupied by people
to live in, he states he does not know anything Joshua said to
police about know any think about a rave.
The Applicant did not manage to visit him on this day.
The prosecution seems to have come to another conclusion
wrong also and think that possibly members of the public or at
any rate someone reporting to the police that something
suspicious was happening at what was the old Ponders End
Police Station, a deserted, unoccupied, vacant building.
This is incorrect There was an information report by PC Jackson,
which is to be found at pages 118 to 120 in relation to that
occasion.