Page 641 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

date, 12th January 2013, "Trespassers on site, illegal rave, forced entry,
shed 4, police tasked, no action, group left site. The evidence the applicant
put forward in regards to this claim is contained at page (0000) and Page
(0000) And this should be very easy to prove as for fact when the
applicant was first said to have been served he disputed this fact, as can
clearly be seen by the letter of complaint made to the police contained at
page (000) His mother in fact hand delivered the folder to Edmonton police
station to lost property and collect a receipt contained at page number (000)
Contained in this folder first said to have been served by official police
officers was an Asbo application which had inside of it some of the
following:
1. 4 x Members of the publics witness statements.
2.
3.
4.
Since the on goings of the case have proceeded the prosecutions have
allowed for additional information to be made and then sneaked into the
application. The list below has now been included within the Asbo
application an additional: -
1. Twelve more members of the publics witness statements.” wrongfully
added” and not signed by member of the public.
2.
3.
4.
When the applicant noticed this he phoned the police and questioned them
in regards to why this had happened, he also requested to reclaim the folder
that was handed in to the Edmonton police stations lost property room, he
received a reply as can be seen in a copy of the audio voice recording
transcripts provided in the applicants response bundle now at page numbers
(000) The Asbo bundle that was handed to the police stations lost property
has now been stolen and not returned. Appellant will also state that the
police did not exercise any powers under section165A of the Road Traffic
Act 1988. The Appellant will state that his vehicle was not seized under
section 64 of the Criminal Procedure and Public Order Act 1994 because
this was not an illegal rave as defined under section 63(1). Mr. Simon
Cordell inserts and instates his legal Rights of the Freedom of Movement,
as expressed in article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it
quotes; that a citizen of a state in which that Citizen is present has the
liberty to travel, reside in, and/ or work in any part of that state where one
pleases within the limits of respect for the liberty and rights of others. At
no point of time within the dates that the applicant rests its case upon does
the applicant use his vehicle to organize or take part in an illegal rave
knowingly. The Appellant will state that his vehicle was not seized, under
Section 62 which provides the power for the police to seize vehicles of
persons failing to comply with a direction under s6 1. The Appellant will
state that on (page141 Respondent bundle) the police wrongly entered in an
intelligence report that there was no insurance for his vehicle.
2. In reference to the 07th April 2013, Blake’s House: --
07/04/2013
= In Steve Elsmore Statement that is dated