Page 648 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

Mr. Simon Cordell states that he was just arriving at progress
way and was said to have been seen by police.
On page 37 A/ Inspector Hamill 01566 states; Saturday the 7th
June he was again on duty and that he did in fact see the
applicant for the first time, on the 3rd line from the last sentence
of his statement.
This is incorrect as this was on the
08th June 2014
at around 200 hours am
CAD 1047 Name PC239YE Shinnick (pages 186 to 190) at 1:59
on 7th June 2014, made a 999 call while on duty outside of the
gates of Progress way grid location X, 534380 to Y, 195513
stating that he is a police officer calling the Enfield Patrol Site,
Call name is of a PC Shinnick, “please allow an officer to call on
duty.”
When checking all 999 calls cad numbers expected to relate to
Progress Way, any person checking would notice that all the 999
call were made from the same grid reference location that Pc
Shinnick made cad 1047 from or from locations to far to have
any relevance.
When taking a closer inspection of the rest of the cads and
keeping this knowledge of pc Shinnick making a 999 call from
location X, 534380 to Y, 195513 the time of cad 1047 is of a
high relevance (cad opening time 1:59 on the 7th June)
Then looking at cad number 1012 page number 155 to 158 with
an opening time stamp of 01:53 to 01:56 with the same grid
reference number as cad 1047 a X, 534380 to Y, 195513 with
this information there is no other options other than three
minutes before PC239YE Shinnick made the call creating cad
1047 he made cad 1012 from the same location unless another
person was standing on his toes.
This leaves many more concerns as it seems that all 16 residents
who lived at wood grange gardens, all so seemed to have left
their homes and made their 999 call for services from the same
location grid reference number X, 534380 to Y, 195513 to where
pc Shinnick had been standing and made his call for services
while on duty.
This is clear corruption that the applicant should never have to
suffer for also taking into count that the 16-witness statement are
not signed by members of the public.
The first cad contained within the Asbo application in relation to
Progress Way is a 999 call made to the Esso petrol station on the
other side of the rd. to Progress Way the name of the road in
between is named the Great Cambridge Road and has a hedge in
the centre of the lanes causing none visibility in see the Esso
petrol station from Progress way this is also to include the
distance of the alley way about (000) meters in length.
A/Insp Hamill states; “that the officers that he had sent, had
reported back that Mr. Simon Cordell and Mr. Tyrone Benjamin
were present, and goes on to state that officers were not allowed