Page 650 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

with Acting Police Sergeant civilizes and two Environmental
Officers and that this evidence relates not only to the loud noise,
but also to the involvement of the appellant, because when she
arrived, she asked for the event organizer and the event
organizer, or a man, came from within the venue.
The applicant does prosiest that he was not the organizer of the
event neither was he a residing occupier of the land.
As A/Insp Hamill 01566 states; “at 0200hrs on Sunday the
07th of June 2014
the applicant did in fact arrive,”
This is incorrect and can be understood because of the times he
states in his statement and in fact was the 8th of
June 2014
Inspector Hamill say in her evidence, "I’d asked for the
organizer," and that was who presented himself to her.
No-one else did.
(On page 33) An Insp Hamill 201566 states that she sees the
applicant, at the gates but believed that the applicant was coming
from inside the premises.
The applicant will state due to the large number of people at the
location and due to the time of night causing insufficient lighting
source to the alley of Progress Way and the clear fact that he was
approaching Progress Way from the great Cambridge Road that
the inspectors is mistaken.
A/Insp Hamill 01566 Could not be sure of the fact of the person
that she is stating was at the gate did in fact bring Mr. Simon
Cordell back to the gate, she does not state that she wrote down
or took the name of the person whom is said to have come back
with Mr. Cordell.
A/Insp Hamill states: - the person she had asked to find the
organizer, said to her that the applicant was in fact the person she
had gone to collect. When A/Insp Hamill asked for assistance
from the people at the entrance of progress way it seem strange
that no police name checks took place and neither that being of
any name(s) or personal details of the gate assistances being
taken as stranded police procedure, this refusal of signature and
response should be noted within the police officers note books
that have been requested by the applicant.
He also states that the applicant would not in fact speak to him,
so if this was true then why would the applicant have approached
him to speak to him as the event organizer and not speak, the
truth is that the applicant was just arriving.
This would be proved by a copy of A/Insp Hamill Police note
book that has been requested as disclosure.
No police officers did in fact see the applicant, on the
06 + 07/06/2014
06th 7th Jun 2014
because he was not the organizer neither was, he presents on
them date mentioned.