Page 647 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half
P. 647

because of the terms of the ASBO application. the Applicant
                 states yes at the time it would have been better to keep them in
                 his van due to the weather, but when he does intend to go for a
                 drive that he does not feel safe any longer travelling with any
                 sound equipment.
                 The applicant states that it was proven that he did nothing wrong
                 on the date and this is why he was allowed to leave after the
                 CCTV had been checked.
                 Neither is the applicant sure if the occupiers were still allowed to
                 stay in their current home by the police and he would like to
                 highlight that that the “Police state that they have footage of
                 several suspects causing damage to the security cameras and
                 door locks.
                 The Applicant will state that was not one of them people.
                 The prosecution rest there evidence in this instance on
                 speculation such as the quoted: - “At the time the applicant
                 explained that he was delivering food to his friends while
                 visiting them,” if the police officers at the location believed this
                 then the applicant should have been arrested but was not in fact
                 the applicant questions why this incident was noted on the police
                 pnc and then was further updated (333) days later, this date of
                 amendment was once the Asbo application was in development
                 then inputted in to it context.
                 The prosecution persisted that the squatters would not have had
                 time to become squatters or friends who needed food, because
                 they had only just entered the premises.
                 The applicant proclaims his innocents and is sure that the
                 residents of the occupation were residing at 5 St George’s
                 Industrial Estate from the
                 24/05/2014
                 24th May 2014
                 In Reference to the 6th 7th 8th JUNE 2014; Progress Way in
                 relation to the Asbo: --
                 In relation to the
                 06/07/08th June 2014
                 Mr. Simon Cordell will state that he was not involved in the
                 organization of and or supplied equipment for and or attended an
                 illegal rave at an empty ware house on Progress way Enfield.
                 In the prosecutions bundle there are 93 incident numbers relating
                 to the
                 06th 7th 8th June 2014
                 that the applicant is being accused of and only 34 complete cad
                 files in the bundle.
                 The Applicants has requested disclosure so to receive all of the
                 related missing documentation to the missing 59 cads, 999 calls.
                 This missing information has been requested so that the
                 applicant will be able to defend himself from all accusation
                 creating the bases of the ASBO application.
                 Around 2:00am on the
                 08th
   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652