Page 498 - 11. 2019 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 498

To: 'Edmonton County, Enquiries'
               Subject: RE: FOOED222 Enfield Council V Simon Cordell
               Importance: High
               To Whom It May Concern:
               I am writing this email in the hope you will be able to help me.
               It is regarding case FOOED222 Enfield Council V Simon Cordell
               The case was last in court on the 08/03/2019 when District Judge Davies heard the case and
               set out an order due to my son's health please see attached court order dated 11/03/2019.
               District Judge Davies ordered that
               •  These proceedings are adjourned generally with permission to restore in order for the
                   parties to apply to the Official Solicitor to consider whether he is prepared to act as
                   Litigation Friend for the Defendant. If no request to restore is made by 4pm on
                   08/06/2019, the claim will stand "struck out without further order.
               •  Costs reserved.
               I have contacted the court and it would seem Enfield Council submitted a letter to restore this
               case FOOED222, and so far, nothing has been done with this.
               But the issue I have is that Enfield Council has done nothing they have not tried to work with
               Mr Cordell's Official Solicitor they have not contacted them at all since the last hearing of the
               08/03/2019, they also did not notify Mr Cordell's Solicitor that they had put in to restore this
               case FOOED222, the only reason we know anything is due to me contacting the court by
               telephone on the 10/06/2019 to see if the case had been "struck out" which I was told it has
               not been due to the letter Enfield Council had submitted to the court to restore it and move
               forward with the case.
               We do not know any details of this letter Enfield Council has sent to the court to restore this
               case and under what grounds and when it was sent to the court from Enfield Council.
               This is not the 1st time Enfield Council has not followed a court order, there is an outstanding
               court order that has never been dealt with by Enfield Council in which Enfield Council
               should have moved my son which they have never done anything about and then submitted
               this new case FOOED222.for which is an abuse of court process .
               This is not helping my son's health and Enfield Council is very aware of this, I do not know
               what to do, all of these entire court cases one after the other which Enfield Council has done
               since 2017 is having a very damaging effect deteriorating and impacting my son's health.
               It is Enfield Council that has chosen not to communicate with me on behalf of my son, It is
               Enfield Council that has not once asked to see proof that these alleged allegations are false, to
               be able to address anything I would need Enfield Council to work with me, but they will not
               and I have never been rude to anyone within Enfield Council for them to not to want to
               communicate with me.
               Could the court please tell us what is going on with this court case as not knowing what is
               going on is making things worse for my son not knowing if he is going to be made homeless.
               362,
               Regards
               Lorraine Cordell (on behalf of Simon Cordell)

               The banging Started!

               Summary!

               Disrepair!

               Time Spent Building.
   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503