Page 532 - tmp

Since detainee there has been many issues of concern that are to be raised and them
issues of concern do in fact, contained wrongful personal information on the RIO data
base and St Ann’s computer systems inclusive of any other medical data in regards to
doctor and client personal data and that information being not correct of it facts, so for
any medical provisions to be able to use that information in a true positive method, as
for that information can be proved to be fabricated and therefore false intelligence or
classed as Intel.

Such fabricated medical intelligence was prepared by a Dr Rosemary Mill a St4
doctor in response for Dr Julia Cranitch, who states she has personal knowledge of Mr
S. Cordell, Since the 22 nd of august which is understood to be the start of her Job title
for St Ann’s hospital, contained in a prepared doctors statement that was requested to
be served in a paper format as legal required for a tribunal.

th
on the 25 08 2016 a prepared copy of the doctors notes made from all nurses
assessment notes and there own personal involvement with myself, should have been
served towards my self so to be able to prepare a fair deface for tribunal this should
have been achieved by mid-day and was not. When staff was asked it was said my
acting solicitor will be able to show my self a copy even low a consent form had been
completed and submitted into St Ann’s hospital.

I Mr Simon Cordell feel that was I not served in accordance of the legalisation frame
work that represents the mental health act 1983, neither assessed at the correct
opportunity falsifying my illegal detainee.

I Mr S. Cordell was in fact shown a copy of the doctor’s reports 20 minutes before the
tribunal started by my acting solicitor due to a break down in communications and
never had the opportunity to analyse any official documentation to in fact be able to
stand a true legal defence.

As a matter of fact the tribunal did go in my favour and I feel a fair and equal decision
was made by the boards official panel this decision was of the conclusion as quoted
The section 2 Mental Health act 1983 was removed of my statue of liberty and I
agreed to the doctors decision of staying in St Ann’s hospital as a formal patient,

As the tribunal is held in St Ann’s hospital there is less than a 5 minute walk from the
assessment wing to were I have been detained while being assessed and on arriving
back to the ward after the panel turned the decision in my favour I had the first
opportunity to assess the doctors notes used in the tribunal in regards to myself that
had been pre drafted and not severed to my self in accordance of the duration of the
time limit that legal jurisdiction apposes and felt the need to correct wrongful lintel
and state the true claims such tribunals should be based upon.

I have contained evidence that is overwhelming to the fact of the matters that I do
quote within this official document of complaint.

167