Page 536 - tmp
P. 536

was due to start so did not have time to read it before the tribunal started, I did say this to the tribunal
       panel.

       I would also like to draw reference to amending Dr Rosemary Mills report and Goodies Adama
       report:
       This is in high light towards my own personal records that are being held upon RIO system and any
       other form of electronic and paper format that any medical teams may use, so for them official people to
       be able to compile their reports, as referred to as any reports that may relate to the Doctor and clients
       personal & conferential information otherwise known as intelligence.


       Dr Rosemary Mills clearly states in the short time of the two brief meetings held at St Ann’s hospital
       between herself and I that she used such personal information gained and studied from them meetings,
       this was also inclusive of information contained in or on RIO and any other sources that she may have
       used, that do relate towards myself so that she and he could conclude their reports, such information is
       largely incorrect to is evidence and I therefore request that information to be rectified as to being
       amended. Under the data protection act 1998 all information held about a person has to be 100% correct
       this is not the case in my records and so far, I only have limited information that was put in the report for
       the tribunal.



           2. History of Presenting Circumstances 2.1 - 2.2 of Dr Rosemary Mills report:

       Dr Rosemary Mills report has been concluded in receipt for Dr Julia Cranitch.


       I question the statement of facts that the Intel contained in the report regarding past history, not to be
       conclusive, as towards not being true to their facts.

       On the 14/8/2016 I Mr Simon Cordell was arrested by police at my home address at around 20:00 hours
       and taken to Wood Green Police station, it was not the 15/08/2016 as stated in Dr Rosemary Mills
       report.
       The reason for my arrest was allegations I had made threats to harm my neighbour, these are fake
       allegations and when I return to the police station for bail this will be proved as the police are already
       aware my home is covered by CCTV and this will prove I never left my home on this day so could not
       have made any threats to harm my neighbour.
       In Goodies Report it is clamed that it was my mother who put the report into the police about these
       allegations; this is also not correct my mother never contracted the police and reported anything about
       me. It was me that called my mother at 18:41 and told her the police was at my home trying to get in,
       she rushed down to my home with my uncle where there was around 15 police officer at this point and
       they stated recording what was going on, as I told my mother through the door the police had ripped the
       wires out of my CCTV system to the front of my home.
       I Mr Simon Cordell have yet to be interviewed, so to be able to find out who stated such false allegations
       about my mother and myself I am yet to find out, but I do NOT believe it to be my mother.
       My mother was also asked if she had called the police at the Tribunal by the panel and she did not know
       what they were talking about and replied no she had not called the police. She has now had time to read
       the report and is very upset towards a lot of things that have been said and are contained in the report.


       There is also the issue of concern in chapter 2.1 - 2.2 of Rosemary Mills report in regards to the
       wrongful truth in the statement being used relating to a police FME seeing myself, while I was being
       detained at the Wood Green Police Station, this is not true I never saw an FME doctor while at Wood
       green Police Station the cell camera evidence will clearly prove this once served by Wood green Police
       station, There has been a request put in for this information to the police, inclusive of all other notes
       legally made while being detained in cell number 3 and if granted which I could not understand why it
       would not be, this will prove what I have said.

                                                                                                             3

                                                                  171
   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541